Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-08-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

People should never eat meat because raising animals for human consumption is cruel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There is no gainsaying the fact that many people think that people should abstain from eating meat because many animal species are edge on disappearing.I partially agree with this school of thought.

To begin with , one of the plausible reasons is that why masses avoid eating meat because many animal species are in endangered because of ample consumption.For example, black deer and other animals. Apart from this , eating meat cost people deer . For example, the price of meat is expensive rather than vegetarian meals .so,they have to spend more money to buy it.so if people prefer to eat vegetarian food then they can save their money. Moreover, people can fall victim to grave ailments when they eat meat. To examplify, in china , crona virus is spread because of infected pig meat and due to this, all world have to face difficulties.

However , many people think that meat should be mandatory in human diet because they think that people need protein to stay hale and hearty which they can get from animal meat .For example, athletes need a lot of energy to perform better so they cannot give best if they only rely on vegetarian diet.Last but not least , if people avoid eat meat then a lot of companies can be closed which cannot good for economy of every nation and due to this unemployment rate can be increased.

To wrapping up , although there is lot of drawbacks of eating meat but individuals cannot neglected need of this non vegetarian food.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a partially agreeable stance. However, the development of ideas is inconsistent. While the argument regarding health and economic impact is relevant, the supporting points are often under-developed or logically flawed. For example, the claim that 'eating meat cost people deer' is unclear and confusing, and the reference to the coronavirus is factually tenuous and lacks a clear connection to the ethical argument of animal cruelty. The position is clear, but the arguments lack the depth required for a higher band score, as they rely on generalizations rather than well-supported reasoning.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. Phrases like 'To begin with', 'Apart from this', and 'To wrapping up' are used, but the transitions between sentences are sometimes abrupt or illogical. The referencing is occasionally unclear, such as the pronoun usage in the second paragraph. While there is an overall progression of ideas, the lack of sophisticated linking words and the repetitive nature of some transitions limit the flow of the argument.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'many animal species are edge on disappearing', 'eating meat cost people deer', and 'all world have to face difficulties'. The student attempts to use some academic vocabulary, but these attempts are often misused or result in unnatural phrasing. To improve, the student should focus on learning collocations and ensuring that words are used in the correct context rather than relying on memorized phrases that do not fit the sentence structure.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('many animal species are in endangered'), incorrect article usage, and punctuation errors, such as missing spaces after commas and incorrect capitalization. The sentence construction is often fragmented or run-on, which impacts the clarity of the message. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and sentence structure prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. More attention to proofreading and basic syntax is required.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.