Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

People should never eat meat because raising animals for human consumption is cruel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Some people believe that human should completely stop eating meat because raising animals for food is cruel. However, others argue that meat is an importantpart of the human diet and that animals can be raised in suitable conditions. In my opinion, animals cruelty should beprevented, but eating meat should not be completely prohibited.

On the one hand, there are several reason why the people oppose eating meat. Firstly, animals raised for human consumption are sometimes kept in small spaces and are not provided with proper care. This can cause them physical pain and stress. Secondly, many animals are slaughtered at a young age which raises serious ethicalconcerns. for these reasons, some people believe thatfollowing a vegetrarian or vegandiet is a more humance choice. Moreover, reducing meat consumptionmay encourage farmers to adopt more animal-friendly practices.

On the other hand, meat provides important nutrients,including protein, iron and vitamin B12. these nutrients more support human growthand overall health, although they can also be obtained from other foods or supplements. Furthermore,meat production provides implement and income for millions of people, particularly those living in rural areas. I believe that the main problemis not necessarily eating meat its self, but the crueltreatment of animals. Government should introduce strict regulation to ensure that animals are raised and slaughtered humenly.

In conclusion, although raising animals for food can involve cruelty, I do not believe that people should completely stopped eating meat. Instead, animal welfare standards should be improved, and people should be in encoureged to make responsible dietary choices.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: animal cruelty should be prevented, but meat should not be prohibited. You address both sides by explaining concerns about cramped conditions and slaughter, then presenting nutritional and economic reasons for continuing meat production. The conclusion reinforces your view and offers a relevant alternative—stronger welfare standards and responsible choices. These points are relevant and generally supported, although some are developed more fully than others. For example, you name protein, iron and vitamin B12 but do not explain why these make meat important when you acknowledge that they can come from other sources. The economic point about income for rural communities is also asserted rather than illustrated. A specific example or fuller explanation would make the support more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs and a conclusion. The progression from reasons to oppose meat consumption to reasons against a complete ban is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. Within paragraphs, ideas are generally presented in a sensible order, with “Firstly” and “Secondly” introducing supporting points. However, some connections are mechanical, and a few transitions between claims could be clearer. For instance, the sentence about nutrients being available from other foods qualifies the preceding point but is not developed into a clear comparison. More varied linking and clearer references between related ideas would make the flow smoother while preserving this effective paragraph structure.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “ethical concerns,” “animal-friendly practices,” “nutrients” and “animal welfare standards.” These choices help communicate the argument, and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more precise language, such as “slaughtered” and “dietary choices.” However, inaccurate word forms, spelling and collocations reduce precision: “animals cruelty” should be “animal cruelty,” “humance choice” should be “humane choice,” and “provides implement and income” does not express the intended economic benefit clearly. Several typing or spelling errors, including “vegetrarian,” “humenly” and “encoureged,” also detract from control. Proofread carefully and learn common topic collocations so that your vocabulary is not only relevant but consistently accurate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses such as “because raising animals for food is cruel” and “although they can also be obtained from other foods or supplements.” This allows you to express contrast and qualification, and the main argument remains understandable. Some grammatical errors nevertheless occur. For example, “there are several reason” needs plural agreement, while “people should completely stopped eating meat” uses the wrong verb form after “should.” In “the main problem is not necessarily eating meat its self, but the cruel treatment,” the sentence needs clearer parallel structure and punctuation. Capitalisation after full stops is also inconsistent. Review subject–verb agreement, modal verb patterns and sentence boundaries, then proofread to improve accuracy across the range of structures you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.