Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that physical education classes are an important part of a child's education. Others believe that it is more important to focus on academics during school time.

Discuss both these views, and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There is an ongoing debate, that physical education should be an important part of curriculum over academics. I believe that being involved in physical education classes helps the student to improve overall development but in a cost of academic studies is not the right path for their career and school should adapt the balance of both. This essay will highlight the point and support my statements.

On the one hand, physical education has many advantages in terms of personality development. For instance, students who participate in football or cricket tends to have a greater muscular strength in comppared with their peers. Also for some students who are taking part in chess,it improve their mental attention span, concentration, critical thinking which will eventually boost their cognitive development.

On the other hand, if growing children are paying attention to their studies it helps them to score well in their term end exams which in future will make them eligible for many job opportunities; many companies have the minimum academic eligibility requirements. At the same time, academic curriculum exposure during school gives the student the chances to find their interest and career. Therefore, neglecting academic during school years could limit children's future educational and career opportunities.

To conclude, I believe that academic studies should not be sacrified to accomodate sports and fitness activitities and school should provide sufficients opportunities for both, enabling students to achieve success in both the aspects.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both perspectives and state a clear preference for balancing academic study with physical education, particularly in the introduction and conclusion. Relevant support includes the possible physical and cognitive benefits of activities, and the role of academic qualifications in future employment. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the academic argument is more fully connected to future opportunities, while the physical-education paragraph relies on brief claims and examples rather than explaining their wider importance. The chess example also shifts from physical education to a mental activity without clarifying its relevance. The response is 13 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop your reasoning. Explain each view more fully and add a specific example before concluding.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “To conclude” make the progression easy to follow. Within paragraphs, however, some connections are abrupt or unclear. For example, the move from football and cricket to chess does not clearly link the example to the point about physical education, and “Therefore” introduces a conclusion that could be more explicitly tied to the preceding explanation. The opening sentence also frames the debate awkwardly, making the relationship between the two positions less clear. Use topic sentences that state each side’s main argument, then connect examples directly to that argument with clearer referencing.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “personality development,” “concentration,” “critical thinking,” “academic eligibility requirements,” and “career opportunities.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and some topic-specific language is attempted. At times, however, word choice and collocation are inaccurate or unnatural, as in “in a cost of academic studies,” “curriculum exposure,” and “sufficients opportunities.” There are also spelling errors such as “comppared,” “sacrified,” and “accomodate,” which reduce the accuracy of the vocabulary. Aim for more natural academic phrasing and check spelling carefully. For instance, describe the need to balance activities with study rather than saying one comes “in a cost” of the other.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “if growing children are paying attention to their studies” and a relative clause in “students who participate in football or cricket.” The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. In “students … tends,” the verb does not agree with the plural subject; “it improve” also needs a singular verb. The opening sentence has an awkward comma after “debate” and an unclear clause structure, while “school should provide” needs an article or plural subject. There are also problems with articles and plural forms in phrases such as “the student” and “both the aspects.” Review subject–verb agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries, then proofread each sentence for a complete, natural structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.