Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world, people rely on private cars for transportation.

In what ways does reliance on private cars affect the way we live?

Do the effects tend to be positive or negative?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In today's fast-paced generation, many individual prefer to drive their private vehicle instead of using a public transport. Using personal car can save time for busy workables, while many individual turns their active life to sedentary lifestyle. This essay will explore the reasons and I believe that it is a negative trend to use own car.

To begin with, one of the main transition is that people get dependent on car for short distance chores. For example, many young adults rely on vehicle just to meet their friends who lives in neighbourhood. This affects negatively on human body which reduce metabolism and people become couch potato. Moreover, pollution is main environmental problem, due to increase in private cars on the roads it creates unnecessary air pollution by releasing fuel.

Furthermore, maintenace of the care is too costly. Nowadays, people buy a luxury cars in comparison with their rich colleague. It tend to hike up fuel price as well as chances of theft increases. For instance, many folks lend money from others to build their luxury lifestyle and end up in burden of debt. In addition, using public transport is time saving and reliable for safe journey which reduces traffic if people primarily depend on government transportation service.

To sum up, in many countries an individual depend on private cars to avoid crowd. But there are many negatives realted to health condition which costs our life. So, I think using public transport over privately owned vehicle is more perferable in this generation. It reduces negative effects of environment.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both questions: you describe effects on health, the environment, personal finances and transport, and you clearly state that reliance on private cars is negative. The examples about young adults driving short distances and people borrowing money for luxury cars help make the discussion relevant. However, some points are asserted rather than explained. For instance, the claim that public transport is “time saving and reliable” is not supported, and the link between luxury cars and higher fuel prices is unclear. Develop the strongest effects with a clearer explanation of how they change daily life, and use examples that directly support your claims. This would make the response more fully developed and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally group related ideas, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore” and “To sum up” make the progression easy to follow. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. The second body paragraph moves from maintenance costs to luxury purchases, theft, debt and then public transport without explaining how these points relate. In the first paragraph, the contrast introduced by “while” is understandable but the relationship between saving time and becoming sedentary could be made more explicit. Organise each paragraph around one main effect and use linking phrases to show cause, consequence or contrast more precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary, including “sedentary lifestyle,” “air pollution,” “fuel price” and “burden of debt,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “short distance chores” and “luxury lifestyle.” However, several word choices, collocations and spellings are inaccurate or unnatural, including “fast-paced generation,” “busy workables,” “maintenance of the care” and “real ted” (intended as “related”). These errors sometimes make the reader pause or infer the intended meaning. Aim for accurate, natural combinations and check spelling carefully; for example, use “busy workers,” “car maintenance” and “related to health.” This would make your vocabulary more precise and fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional-style explanation with “if people primarily depend on government transportation service” and a cause-and-effect sentence about pollution. The main message remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Examples include subject–verb agreement in “many individual turns” and “people who lives,” missing or incorrect articles in “using personal car” and “a luxury cars,” and the sentence fragment-like construction “due to increase in private cars on the roads it creates.” There are also awkward sentence patterns that obscure relationships between ideas. Review agreement, articles and sentence boundaries, and practise building complex sentences with a clear subject and main verb. More accurate control would make your arguments easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.