Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, the use of mobile is increasing day by day. Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal. I am partially agree with this statement which I will discuss in the upcoming paragraphs.

On the one hand, the main reason to agree with this statement is that cell phone can distracted drivers form their driving and it can cause the accident. Which is not only can harm them but also the other people on the road. Apart from that, if drivers are using moblie during their driving it can cause the traffic jam because they can't fully concentrate on their way and it doesn't matter if they are just using the cell phones for listening to music or news. For instance, a survey conducted in 2022, shows that 73 percent of road accident happened beacuse of the drivers who were using cell phones during their rides.

On the other hand, the one reason for disagreement is that drivers need to use the phones to reach their destination by using the digital maps. If cell phones use by them made illegal they will depend only on the old paper maps which can be time consuming beacuse it will not show them about the real time update which a mobile map can give them. In addition, some drivers are spending most of their time far from their families so mobile phone is only way they can contact their families and can talk to them. Moreover, if they may be need help in their way so need to make a call to ask help form someone. For example, If a driver's vichle got damage in midway so he has to call for help and if the phones will be illegal for them then it will crete more problems for them in that kind of situation.

In conclusion, I agree that drivers should not use mobile during their rides if it is not necessery beacuse it can cause the problem not only for them but also for the others who are driving on the same road. But it is not right to made it illegal because they also need to call someone in emergency and I think government should make strict laws that they can only talk on teh call when they are in a safe place or at the side of the road where others will not affect by their actions.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you oppose a complete ban but support restricting phone use while driving, and the conclusion restates this distinction. You address both sides with relevant points, including distraction and accidents, navigation, family contact, and emergencies. The accident statistic and breakdown example provide some support. This meets the task well, while the partial agreement is not fully defined: it would help to distinguish prohibited activities, such as holding a phone to call or text, from permitted hands-free navigation or emergency use. Some points, particularly the claim that phone use causes traffic jams and the need to contact family, are asserted more than explained. Developing these ideas and linking them more directly to a practical policy would make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall progression: an introduction, a paragraph presenting reasons for a ban, a contrasting paragraph, and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the structure easy to follow, and examples are placed alongside the relevant arguments. Cohesion is generally effective, though some linking phrases are used mechanically, and the long second body paragraph combines navigation, family contact, and emergencies without clearly separating their importance. The sentence beginning “Which is not only…” is also detached from the preceding idea, interrupting the flow. To strengthen progression, connect each example explicitly to the claim it supports and use paragraphing or clearer transitions to distinguish separate reasons.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main arguments, including “distracted,” “digital maps,” “real time update,” and “emergency.” However, the range and control are uneven, with repeated reliance on general words such as “use,” “problem,” and “help.” Several inaccurate or misspelled choices reduce precision, including “mobile” where “mobile phone” is needed, “form” for “from,” “vichle,” and “crete.” Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “during their rides” and “ask help.” These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding your position, but they limit clarity and naturalness. Aim for precise collocations related to road safety and phone use, and proofread spelling and word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, using clauses with “because,” “if,” and “which,” and the overall meaning remains understandable. However, some errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction are noticeable. For example, “I am partially agree” should be “I partially agree,” while “cell phone can distracted drivers” needs a modal or corrected verb form. The fragment “Which is not only can harm them…” should be joined to the previous sentence and restructured. In the conclusion, “it is not right to made it illegal” also shows an incorrect verb pattern. Practise accurate clause construction and modal/infinitive forms, then check each sentence for a complete subject and verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.