Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The use of mobile phone while driving might divert the focus of the driver. However, it became a debatable issue that wheather the usage of cell phones should be completely banned fir the vehicle operator. According to my persoective I believe that a penalty should be imposed on the people who so ever use phones while driving, but should not completely restricted the handling of phone, because their might be the senario of emergency occurance. This essay with discuss both the views along with my opinion.

on the one hand, the operation of mobile phone may cause serious consequences of road accident. A driver who is in motion and simantaneously indulge in the activities of making conversation with their loved ones, on social media watching content might get easily distracted, and loose their focus on handling vehicle which ultimately results into road collision and lead to major injuries or even death. To illustrate, most of the road accidents are occure due to the lack of concentration of driver, because nowdays youngster are always on their phone which eventually lessen the concentation and cause accident.

on the other hand, it is essential that the usage of cell phones should be prohibited while driving, but not completely banned. If their is an emergency situation where driver must have to respond to the call, then driver can park the car, and attend the call. For example, In countries like Canada strict traffic rules were implemented by the Canada government on the usage of phone while driving on driver, If person caught during handling their phone their driving licence must be banned for five years and the fine of $5000 is imposed on operator. Hence, cell phone should not be completely banned, but it is the responsibilty of the user if they want to use it first park their car in safe place.

In conclusion, the usage of mobile phone should be restricted on driver while driving to eliminate the risk of accidents, although a driver can make use of the phone only when vehicle is not in motion.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your response addresses the central issue and gives a discernible position: you support penalties for phone use while driving but oppose a complete ban, allowing use when the vehicle is parked. You also explain the danger of distraction and provide examples, so the main parts of the task are covered. However, the position is not fully consistent: you first argue for penalties, then say phone use should be prohibited, and later qualify this as not completely banned. The emergency-call point is also only partly developed, since parking safely is a solution rather than a reason to permit phone use while driving. The Canada example supports enforcement, but its specific claims would benefit from clearer relevance and explanation.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a recognisable introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and the contrast between the danger of phone use and the need to respond in emergencies gives it an overall logical arrangement. Linking phrases such as “on the one hand,” “on the other hand” and “In conclusion” help signal the structure. Some connections are nevertheless mechanical or unclear. The second body paragraph begins by saying phone use should be prohibited, then immediately says it should not be completely banned, which weakens the progression of the argument. The introduction promises to “discuss both the views,” although the task asks for your degree of agreement, and the conclusion does not clearly restate the distinction between using a phone while driving and using it after parking. Make each paragraph’s main claim explicit and connect examples directly to it.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “distracted,” “road collision,” “major injuries,” “emergency situation” and “traffic rules.” This gives you enough range to communicate the main ideas, and some choices show an attempt to be precise. However, inaccurate word forms, spelling and collocations are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: “persoective,” “simantaneously,” “loose their focus,” “accident are occure” and “emergency occurance.” Phrases such as “handling vehicle” and “usage of phone while driving on driver” are also unnatural. Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than adding more ambitious vocabulary; proofreading spelling and checking common collocations would make your meaning clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses beginning with “because,” “although” and “if,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, control is inconsistent: several complex sentences contain faulty structures, and errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence boundaries recur. For example, “it became a debatable issue” does not fit the intended present-time meaning, while “should not completely restricted” is missing the required verb form. In “If their is an emergency situation where driver must have to respond,” the conditional clause has errors in agreement, articles and modal construction. The long sentence beginning “A driver who is in motion” also lacks a clear grammatical structure. Practise building accurate clauses first, then combine them, and check subject–verb agreement and verb forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.