Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

A cellphone become a part and parcel of life in the contemporary era. While driving use of the cellphones is prohibited because It involve extensive risk and numbers of distraction. If questioned I strongly agree with this statement that use of cellphone while driving should be illegal. My preference will justified in the upcoming paragraphs with valid reasons and appropriate examples.

Scrutinising the facts from the grassroots level, the first one is that this rule can save a lot of life and reducing the number of motor-vehicle accidents due to distraction. For instance, according to the reports in American Journal that 80% of the road accidents is causing because of the cellphones. Moreover, there are higher chances to getting lost in that device and putting your life in danger. These strict regulations can be helpful to the large extent because it will help you to focus on the road and concentrate on your driving throughout whole journey. A cellphones is great distractors because it will impared your cognitive abilities like decision making at the time of emergency.

The another reason for my inclination is that these strong rules can save many lives nowadays, by creating fear of charges. Furthermore, due to that rule some people will not dare to use their phone while driving.

However, some people have actual case of emergencies. So because of that rule they can not check their phone in case of a real need.

Based on the aforementioned reasoning, I still stand by my stance. In my opinion this rules is integral part of the modern society. While everybody are checking their screen every 5 minutes, this rule can be essential for many.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly agree that phone use while driving should be illegal, and you return to this view in the conclusion. You give relevant reasons, including accident risk, impaired decision-making and deterrence through penalties, and you acknowledge the counterpoint of genuine emergencies. However, these points are not developed equally. The emergency objection is mentioned but not answered, and the claim that 80% of accidents are caused by phones needs explanation or a more carefully framed example. To strengthen the response, explain how a law could address emergencies—for example, by allowing drivers to stop safely before using a phone—and extend each main reason with specific supporting detail.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting reasons, a counterargument, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “Furthermore,” and “However” help signal relationships between ideas. At times, though, the progression feels mechanical or the links are not fully clear. The second reason about “creating fear of charges” is brief and overlaps with the earlier point about safety, while the emergency paragraph is not connected to a response or rebuttal. Some references, such as “this rule” and “these strong rules,” could be more precise. Organise the body around distinct reasons, develop each in sequence, and use transitions to show how the counterargument affects your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “motor-vehicle accidents,” “distraction,” “cognitive abilities,” and “decision making.” These choices show an effort to use more specific language, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, some less common expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “a part and parcel of life,” “Scrutinising the facts from the grassroots level,” and “my preference will justified.” There are also word-choice and form errors in “a great distractors” and “impared.” Aim for natural collocations and precise forms rather than elaborate phrases: for example, say that phones are “an integral part of modern life” and that a rule can “reduce the risk of accidents.” Proofreading spelling and word forms would improve clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional idea in “because it will help you to focus on the road” and a concession beginning “However.” The main argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentences awkward. Examples include “A cellphone become” instead of “A cellphone has become,” “this rules is” instead of “these rules are,” and “everybody are checking” instead of “everybody is checking.” Articles, plurals and verb forms also need attention in “A cellphones” and “80% of the road accidents is causing.” Practise checking subject–verb agreement and sentence completeness, and revise each sentence for tense and article use. More consistently accurate complex sentences would make your reasoning easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.