Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

These days, people are using cell phones while driving, which is causing accidents on the roads. I completely agree with the statement, which I am going to write it in the further paragraphs.

To Begin with, using smart phones while driving is extremely dangerous because when people text or doing calls on phone it is distract them from from the roads and it leads to accidents. Many years people died due to this. It is very dangerous for people who are using phone and other people who driving safely. For example, if bus driver is using smart phone while driving a bus, and bus got into accident with other car, who was safely driving. It makes passangers and other car driver life at risks.

Furthermore, If government ban using of cell phones for drivers it can saves lot of lives. When diver is focused on driving there will be very less chances of accidents. For example, driver who is not using cell phone can prevent see things on the roads and prevent any accident. This way people will also feel safe.

To conclude, Banning cell usage while driving is much relevent and it can save lots of people life and make society safe. government can put fines and suspend driver license who use cell phones while driving

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you completely agree that phone use while driving should be prohibited, and both body paragraphs give relevant reasons—distraction can cause crashes, and a ban could save lives. The bus-driver example also helps illustrate the risk to passengers and other road users. However, the ideas remain quite general and are not developed with much explanation or evidence; for instance, the claim that many people have died is not supported, and the second example does not explain how a driver would prevent an accident. The response also does not meet the stated 250-word minimum, which limits the opportunity to develop your reasons. Add a fuller explanation and a specific, relevant example for each main point.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from the danger of distraction to the possible benefits of a ban is easy to follow, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore,” and “To conclude” make the organisation clear. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent arrangement and shows some stronger control through paragraphing and logical sequencing. However, the linking is somewhat formulaic, and some connections between ideas are unclear—for example, the sentence about a driver who is not using a phone preventing an accident does not explain the process. Develop each paragraph around one clearly explained point, and use referencing and transitions more naturally.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic vocabulary to communicate the main argument, including “distracted,” “accidents,” “ban,” “fines,” and “suspend driver license.” However, the range is limited and several noticeable word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems make parts less natural or precise. Examples include “cell usage,” “people life,” “passangers,” and “much relevent.” Some phrases are also awkward, such as “using of cell phones” and “at risks.” These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding your position, but they reduce clarity and control. Build a small set of accurate collocations for this topic, such as “impose a ban,” “cause a collision,” and “put lives at risk,” and check spelling before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional example beginning “if bus driver is using smart phone” and a reason clause with “because.” However, the complex structures are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to read. For example, “which I am going to write it” has an incorrect clause structure, while “when people text or doing calls … it is distract them” has problems with verb forms and sentence construction. There are also errors with articles, agreement, and plurals, as in “if bus driver” and “it can saves.” Practise forming complete clauses with consistent verb patterns, then check articles and subject–verb agreement. Aim for accurate sentences before adding complexity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.