Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

I partialy agree that using mobile phone while driving vehicle such as car, truck, bike and many other should be banned as they disturbs the concentration of driver. Let us discuss why? it should not allowed and need of using cell phone while driving in upcoming paraghraphs.

To start with, cell phones should not be allowed to use while driving because it can lead an accident. To eleborate, cell phone can become distraction if been used in unappropraite manner and due to loss of focus from road it can become a reason for accident. For example, if person a is driving car and while he was stucked in traffic in which cars we moving at slow speed and he started getting boared. so, he started watching reels on instagram which divided his attention while which his he noticed when to move car but when it was time to stop his eyes were on phone screen due to which he failed to brake and accident happened.

On the other hand, cell phone can be helpfull to reach the destination fasted and efficenty. In today's world we have techonology of gps which can be safely used while driving which will help us to find faster routes which will save our crucial time.

To conclude, as per my opionions i do not fully agree that cell phones should be made illegal. eventhough, undoughtedly they makes distraction and are solid cause of accidents they are also very usefull in time saving if used with proper safety.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you partly disagree with a complete ban, while recognising that phone use can cause accidents. You address both sides, and the traffic example gives relevant support for the danger of distraction. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The accident example is detailed, whereas the GPS point is brief and does not explain how drivers can use it safely—for instance, by setting a route before moving or using voice directions. The opening also promises to discuss why phones “should not allowed” and why they are needed, but the essay does not fully clarify what kinds of use should be illegal. Develop this distinction and explain your position more precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph about distraction, a contrasting paragraph about GPS, and a conclusion. Connectors such as “To start with,” “On the other hand,” and “To conclude” help signal the direction of the argument. At times, however, the linking is mechanical or unclear. The opening question “Let us discuss why?” interrupts the flow, and the long traffic example contains several events joined together without clear sentence boundaries, making the sequence harder to follow. The conclusion repeats the main contrast but does not clearly connect it to a specific policy position. Use clearer sentence divisions and make the relationship between each example and your argument explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “distraction,” “concentration,” “GPS,” “routes,” and “accidents,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range and control are limited, with repeated use of “cell phone” and several inaccurate or misspelled expressions that make the writing less fluent. Examples include “boared,” “techonology,” “fasted,” and “undoughtedly”; phrases such as “divided his attention” and “solid cause” are also not natural in this context. Aim for more precise collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, describe a phone as “distracting the driver” and say that GPS can “help drivers find a quicker route,” rather than relying on awkward or imprecise phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional example beginning “if person a is driving” and a contrast introduced by “even though.” The main message remains understandable, but some errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and verb forms reduce accuracy. For example, “they disturbs the concentration” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “it should not allowed” is missing an auxiliary verb. In the traffic example, “cars we moving” and “he failed to brake and accident happened” show problems with verb forms and articles. Some sentences also run together, particularly in the example. Practise building accurate clauses first, then combine them with conjunctions and use punctuation to separate each stage of the example.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.