Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

I totally agree that cell phones should be illegal while driving as they are dangerous because they lead to distraction. Let us discuss following thing in upcoming paraghraphs.

To start with, using cell phone while driving should be fully banned as it is a main reason of accidents on roads. To eleborate, cell phones have many applications in it such as instagram in while to see reels you have to scroll them which can divert drivers attention and due to lack of attention collision can take place. For example while i was studying in university i read an article which was prepared to get ready for an exam of TCP (traffic control person) in which they stated that using cell phone is in one of the top 5 reason for accident happening on highways.

Moreover, using mobile phone while being a driver is sometime life threatning as per my knowleadge which i studied during my university classes of human body in biology subject, it can lead driver to become unable to see road at night time as mobile phone screens are bright even if brightness is complete dim which can lead a unexpect darkness after turning screen of as the brightness has been totally for which brain need few secound to process.

To conclude, i am in favour of getting cell phone illegal while driving vehicle as it is a one of biggest reason of accidents as well as it is life threating to use it at night time specially.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the opening—“I totally agree”—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You give two relevant reasons: distraction from phone applications and a possible effect on vision at night, and you attempt to support them with an example from an article and your biology studies. This addresses the task, but the ideas are not equally clear or fully developed. The first example is vague because the article’s findings are not explained or quantified, while the night-vision claim needs a clearer explanation and stronger support. To develop the response further, explain how these risks justify making phone use illegal, and consider addressing why a legal ban is preferable to other measures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion that restates your view. Transitions such as “To start with,” “Moreover,” and “To conclude” help signal this progression. However, some linking is mechanical, and the opening promise to discuss the issue “in upcoming paraghraphs” does not add useful direction. Within the body paragraphs, several ideas are packed into long sentences, making the relationship between the claim, explanation, and example harder to follow. Use clearer sentence boundaries and refer back to each main point explicitly. For instance, explain the article’s relevance immediately after mentioning it, rather than leaving its evidence general.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “distracted,” “collision,” “applications,” and “life threatening,” and you attempt more specific language when describing the effects of screen brightness. However, the range and control are uneven, with noticeable spelling and word-choice errors that sometimes make meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “eleborate,” “knowleadge,” and “threatning,” as well as unnatural phrases such as “getting cell phone illegal” and “a unexpect darkness.” Choose accurate collocations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms such as “prohibit mobile-phone use,” “road collisions,” and “temporary difficulty adjusting to darkness” would express your ideas more naturally and clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including explanations with “as” and “which,” and the overall meaning is generally recoverable. However, some sentence structures are difficult to follow, particularly the long sentence beginning “Moreover, using mobile phone while being a driver…” and continuing through the explanation of screen brightness. There are also errors in articles, agreement, and sentence construction, as in “a one of biggest reason” and “cell phones have many applications in it.” Break long explanations into shorter sentences, and check that subjects and verbs agree and that articles are used appropriately. More consistent control of these patterns would make your reasoning easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.