Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent times, mobile phone has become essential part of everyone's life. It is often said that using cell phones during driving is not safe as it distracts the driver so, it should be made illegal for safety concern. I firmly agree with this perception that mobile phone should be prohibited for several reasons which I elaborate in the forthcoming paragraphs.

To commence with, the first and foremost significant reason for prohibition of cell phone is avoiding major accidents as individual use their phones while driving which reduces the balance on brakes as well as on stiring as they get confused how to manage the situation when some vehicle coming in front of them. As a result of which, major accidents occurs and people suffers from serious injuries and sometimes leads to life long problems in their body.

Furhermore, another reason is creating traffic congestion on the roads which can restrain the important meetings, functions as well as it can also create the obstacles for ambulances. This can make the situation worse for the on-duty police officers as it is difficult to handle the huge traffic especially on main highways where every heavy vehicle moves and sometimes can create the conflict between drivers.

To conclude, use of cell phones should be banned during driving for reducing major accidents and traffic congestion which would be beneficial for everyone. A proper rules and regulations should be implemented by the ruling authorities for maintaining and protection of the wellbeing in the long run.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: “I firmly agree” that phone use while driving should be prohibited, and the conclusion restates this view. You give two relevant reasons—accidents and traffic congestion—and explain some consequences, including injuries and delays to ambulances. This addresses the task, but the reasons are not developed equally or precisely. The accident paragraph explains distraction in general, while the claim that phone use “reduces the balance on brakes” is unclear; the congestion paragraph would benefit from explaining how phone use causes traffic to build up. Add a specific example or a clearer chain of cause and effect for each point, and briefly acknowledge or distinguish hands-free use if relevant.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “To commence with,” “Furthermore,” and “To conclude” makes the progression easy to follow. However, some linking is mechanical, and a few connections between ideas are not fully clear. For example, the move from phone distraction to “reduces the balance on brakes” is difficult to follow, while the link between congestion and delayed meetings is asserted rather than explained. The long sentence about highways also combines several points without clear boundaries. Use simpler transitions where appropriate, and organise each body paragraph around one main claim followed by a clear explanation and example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of topic-related vocabulary, including “distracted,” “traffic congestion,” “ambulances,” and “ruling authorities,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “for several reasons” and “in the long run.” However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural: “balance on brakes,” “stiring,” “restrain the important meetings,” and “the wellbeing” do not express the intended meanings clearly. Spelling errors such as “Furhermore” and “stiring” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural combinations—for example, describe a driver losing control or being unable to react quickly—and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a reason clause (“as it distracts the driver”) and a result clause (“which would be beneficial for everyone”). The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but errors in articles, agreement, plurals, and sentence construction are noticeable. Examples include “mobile phone has become essential part,” “individual use,” “major accidents occurs,” and “people suffers.” The sentence beginning “As a result of which” is also an incomplete construction, and “A proper rules and regulations” has a mismatch between the article and plural noun. Review subject–verb agreement and singular/plural forms, and break up long sentences so that complex structures remain controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.