Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In. my opinion, use of mobile while driving is one of most major cause of distraction. In today's world with the increase in population rise of road accidents are reaching to maximum. However with the busy schedule most of the people starting scheduling their routine far before reaching to their work, however they neglect the rules and regulation on road which in future cause consequences.

Government had prepared set of laws which uphold the use of phone which controlling a motor vehicle. Although most human being ignore that which is making many life at risk. Talking about my personal experience when I coming back from work and was waiting at the signal to go green , I noticed majority of people are indulged in their phone, although light turned green but most of them were still not paying attention which caused to traffic jam.

Further more, it is understandable that technology has played vital role in our day to day activities, Specially cell phones had made human life convient and faster. Due to which people underestimate their risk of life.

In conclusion, Government should impose strict law and heavy fine on people who they found distracted on their personal devices under "object held in hand while driving". They should be charges with maximum amount which while rise an act of fear among with people. Vehicle should also introduce different sensors to identify the risk and make people more attentive. In addition government should place advertisements beside the road or on the banners to make people more aware.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is generally clear: you support stronger restrictions and penalties for drivers using phones, especially in the conclusion. The personal example of people remaining distracted after a traffic light turned green is relevant and helps illustrate the danger. You also acknowledge the usefulness of phones, which begins to address the issue with some balance. However, the response does not fully explain whether phone use should be illegal in all circumstances, and several points—such as population growth and vehicle sensors—are introduced without showing how they support your central argument. Develop the reasons more fully, for example by explaining how distraction can cause collisions and why a legal ban is more effective than awareness campaigns alone.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure, moving from an introduction to supporting points and a conclusion. Paragraphing helps separate the personal example, the role of technology, and proposed measures. Linking expressions such as “However,” “Further more,” and “In conclusion” make the direction of the discussion visible. At times, though, connections between ideas are unclear or mechanical: the opening moves from population growth to busy schedules and then to road rules without explaining the links. Some references, such as “which” in “which is making many life at risk,” are also difficult to follow. Build a clearer progression by giving each paragraph one main reason and using explicit links between its explanation and example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “distraction,” “traffic jam,” “strict law,” “heavy fine,” and “sensors,” so the main ideas are understandable. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “impose” and “consequences.” However, inaccurate word choice and collocation sometimes make the meaning awkward, as in “use of phone which controlling a motor vehicle” and “maximum amount which while rise an act of fear.” Spelling and word-form errors, including “convient” and “Further more,” also reduce precision. Aim for natural combinations and check word forms: for example, say “using a phone while operating a vehicle” and “impose a substantial fine.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a concession beginning “Although” and a personal anecdote with a time clause. This shows some range, but errors in sentence construction and verb forms are noticeable and occasionally make relationships between ideas hard to understand. Examples include “most of the people starting scheduling,” “when I coming back from work,” and “Government had prepared set of laws.” Articles, agreement, and punctuation also need attention, as in “one of most major cause” and the comma spacing around “green , I noticed.” Practise forming complete clauses and checking tense consistency; for instance, “When I was coming back from work, I noticed…” would make the anecdote clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.