Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-07-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, accident on roads seen mor. In which there is an argument that crash on road held because of cell phone used during driving. I totally agree to this statement. Essay will justifrd my side with proper explanation.

To embark on, use of mobile while driving causes some issue. First demeirt of using cell phone is driver will distracted the focues from driving and miss the lane. As a consequence, major road crash is lead by this in which people not only have major injury but also loss the life. Secondly, use of mobile can created tempory vision problem during night. To explain it, brightness of phone screen is high and looking constanly create a blank sopt for few seconds as a result, driver loss control on vehicle.

Furthermore, driver have to pay high charges. This is because, as per the law is driver use cell phone while driving then driver have to pay fine also gets the demerit points. For example, in Ontario if highway police catch the driver using mobile while driving, police charger fine of $5000 as well as give 6 demerit points.

However, sometimes accident held on roads because of over speeding. Because, while driving a car in speed and when have to stop immedatily then driver loss control and have a crash which also impact the other drivers. To illustrate it, having a crash creat traffice which delay to reach at loaction.

In conclusion, although over speeding is one reason of accident, but mostly crash on highway held because of using mobile phone as driver loss the control, loss vision and loss of life

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. The ideas are relevant, such as the mention of distraction and vision impairment, and the example regarding Ontario traffic laws provides specific support. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited; the explanation of how phone brightness causes vision loss is a bit simplistic, and the paragraph regarding over-speeding is slightly tangential as it shifts focus away from the primary argument of cell phone use. To reach a higher band, ensure that every paragraph directly reinforces your central argument rather than introducing competing causes for accidents.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'To embark on', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion', though some of these are used mechanically or are slightly unnatural in an academic context. Referencing is generally clear, but the flow between sentences is occasionally interrupted by grammatical errors. The logical progression is present, but the transition between the argument for banning phones and the counter-argument about speeding could be smoother to improve the overall coherence of the piece.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for higher bands. There are several instances of word-choice errors, such as 'accident on roads seen mor' (more accidents are seen) and 'major road crash is lead by this'. The student attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'demerit points' and 'highway police', which is positive. However, frequent spelling errors (e.g., 'justifrd', 'demeirt', 'tempory', 'constanly', 'immedatily') and awkward phrasing hinder the overall impact and clarity of the writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay relies heavily on simple sentence structures, and attempts at more complex sentences often contain errors. There are frequent issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'driver loss control', 'use of mobile can created'), article usage, and tense consistency. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma placement. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of grammatical errors requires the reader to exert effort to interpret the intended message. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement would significantly improve the accuracy of the writing.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.