Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-08-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is generally acknowledged by many individuals that the use of mobile device while driving causes distraction which sometimes resulted serious consequences, and it should be completely banned. This essay will explain the underlying reasons behind this phenomenon along with my opinion to completely support this Idea.

To commence with, one of the compelling arguments behind this notion is that it promotes the safety of individuals. To be more precise, by banning the use of mobile phone while driving, drivers will more concentrate on driving and face fewer distractions. Consequently, it can minimize the rate of accidents on roads and improve the road safety. For instance, United Arabia imposed a strict ban on using electronic devices during driving as result the collision rate surprisingly decreased. Therefore, such laws are not only needed to enhance the safety of drivers but also for other road users.

Another persuasive argument is that it will help to reduce fatal rate. In other words, it is commonly observed that every year increasing number of individuals lost their life because of reckless driving which usually happened due to mobile phones distractions. when electronic gadgets are banned while driving, people will drive their vehicles more carefully. As a result, road accident fatal rate would drop.

From what has been discussed, it can be concluded that imposing a strict ban on using mobile phones while driving would promote road safety and save lives of drives as well other road users. I firmly believe that legal authorities had better implement such laws in order to overcome detrimental effects of distractions by mobile phones. o

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, maintaining a clear position throughout. The arguments regarding safety and accident reduction are relevant and logically extended. However, the development is somewhat repetitive; the points about 'safety' and 'reducing fatal rates' overlap significantly. To reach a higher band, the student should aim to introduce a distinct secondary argument, such as the economic impact of accidents or the role of technology in enforcement, to provide a more comprehensive discussion. The example of the 'United Arabia' (likely referring to the UAE) is relevant, but the explanation could be more detailed to fully support the argument.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'To commence with', 'Consequently', and 'In other words' are used to guide the reader. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly repetitive. Paragraphing is used appropriately, though the transition between the two body paragraphs could be smoother. Referencing is generally clear, but there are minor issues with sentence-level flow, such as the slightly awkward phrasing in the final sentence of the first paragraph. Overall, the progression of ideas is easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the student to express their ideas clearly. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as 'detrimental effects' and 'compelling arguments'. However, there are some collocation errors and inaccuracies, such as 'more concentrate on driving' (should be 'concentrate more on driving') and 'fatal rate' (should be 'fatality rate'). The phrasing 'United Arabia' is also slightly imprecise. While the range is sufficient to convey the message, more precise and varied word choices would be needed to achieve a higher band score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors that occur throughout the text, such as 'resulted serious consequences' (should be 'resulted in serious consequences'), 'individuals lost their life' (should be 'lives'), and 'as result the collision rate' (missing 'a' and a preposition). Additionally, there are issues with verb tense consistency and article usage. While these errors do not impede communication, they are frequent enough to prevent the essay from reaching the 7.0 band. The student should focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of prepositions.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.