Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

I strongly agree with this statement. Any act of negligence by the driver can put the life of the driver and the people travelling on the road including pedestrians, and other drivers at risk. Driving is a risky activity, a minor mistake can put several lives at risk. Therefore, using a cell phone while driving can be extremly dangerous, as it can easily distract the driver.

In Pakistan, a large number of accidents occur due to the use of a cell phone while driving. A human being is rebellious by nature. Therefore, people can only be stopped from using a cell phone while driving through stringent regulatory oversight and measures. Therefore, it should not only be made illegal but hefty fines should be imposed followed by at least one year of imprisonment to stop the use of cell phone while driving completely.

In conclusion, I would say that people can only be made civilised through rules and regulations. Therefore, using a cell phone while driving should be made illegal to protect the life of the driver and others to whom the driver owe a responsibility.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response clearly presents a strong position in agreement with the prompt, stating that cell phone use while driving should be made illegal. The writer provides relevant supporting ideas, such as the dangers of driver distraction, the necessity of strict regulatory oversight, and the consequences like hefty fines and imprisonment. However, the response has a significant drawback regarding length: it contains 211 words, which fails to meet the minimum requirement of 250 words. This under-length issue limits the depth of extension and development, preventing the score from reaching higher bands. Despite this, all parts of the task are addressed, and a clear stance is maintained throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay is generally coherent and follows a logical structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas, such as the general dangers of driving in the first body paragraph and specific regulatory measures in the second. Cohesive devices are employed, although there is some noticeable repetition in their use, particularly with words like 'therefore' at the beginning of consecutive sentences ('Therefore, people can only be stopped...', 'Therefore, it should not only...'). Referencing is mostly clear, contributing to an overall logical flow, even if the mechanical use of certain transitions prevents a higher score.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for the task, successfully incorporating terms such as 'negligence', 'stringent regulatory oversight', and 'civilised'. However, there are some minor lexical and spelling inaccuracies, such as the misspelling of 'extremely' as 'extremly'. While the writer attempts less common vocabulary, the overall range is somewhat limited, and phrasing occasionally borders on repetitive. Nevertheless, communication is never impeded, and the vocabulary deployed is sufficient to convey the intended arguments clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writer demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing structures like conditional and causal relationships (e.g., 'Any act of negligence by the driver can put the life of the driver... at risk'). There are several instances of accurate grammar and punctuation, but a few errors persist, such as the subject-verb agreement issue in the final paragraph ('to whom the driver owe a responsibility' should be 'owes'). Despite these occasional errors, they rarely impede communication, placing the response comfortably within the band 6 category for grammatical control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.