Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

In mnay countries, spend most of the driving time using cell phone is degerous has become a matter of growing concern. Cell phone using driving time distarct driver. While cell phone should be illegal for drivers. I parcially agree with this both views because sometimes cell phone may useful for drivers but most use mobile distract driver balance.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why drivers are using cell phone dangerous for their. Firstly, drivers may use mobile phone and they distarct attention in driving. For example, ambulance who is using cell phone while driving time and they distract attention for driving. Thus, Driving can mainly cause become driver distract attention in anytime. Secondly, sometimes mobile phone is essential part of drivers because some driver provides taxi services. Furthermore, government should new introduce driving rules because they can help to much time drivers responsible for their.

On the others hand, some people believe that mobile phone should illegal for drivers. One main reason is that some drivers may use cell phone too much time because they cannot responsible for their. For instance, some drivers are resoponsible for their jobs but a little less drivers not resoponsible for their job because they can often use cell phone and distract for attention like social media or anytime communication others. Hence, some drivers should illegal use for cell phone. In others words, cell phone is not illegal for drivers because sometime drivers considerably communicate with passengers, which can result in helps to create new bond for both.

In conclusion, many drivers may use mobile phone too much and they are lost in their attention and cell phone is essential part of drivers because some drivers provides taxi services. However, some drivers are not responsible for this cause because cell phone helps to consider with passengers and provide better communication. I firmly agree with this both views because I believe that both views are very important for all drivers.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response attempts to address the prompt regarding whether cell phone use while driving should be made illegal, presenting a position that is somewhat unclear and contradictory, as seen in the statement 'I parcially agree with this both views'. Ideas are limited and under-developed, relying on repetitive points about taxi services and distraction without providing fully realised supporting arguments. Examples provided, such as 'ambulance who is using cell phone', are confused and lack clarity, reflecting a minimal and partial response to the task requirements.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is some organisation with clear paragraph breaks and basic linking words such as 'Firstly', 'Secondly', and 'In conclusion', but the overall progression of ideas is frequently disrupted by unclear referencing and repetitive structures. Cohesive devices are sometimes inaccurate or over-used, and sentences within paragraphs do not always flow logically from one to the next. For instance, the transition between discussing taxi drivers and introducing new government rules lacks logical connection, making the text somewhat difficult to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is limited and repetitive, with noticeable errors in word choice and word form that cause some difficulty for the reader. Examples of lexical strain include 'distarct driver' instead of distracting drivers, 'pacialy agree', and 'resoponsible'. The writer attempts less common vocabulary such as 'essential part' and 'considerably communicate', but these terms are often misused or lack precision, placing the response firmly in the lower band range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The text displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, with frequent errors in basic sentence formation, verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and articles. Many sentences are incomplete, ungrammatical, or structurally faulty, such as 'spend most of the driving time using cell phone is degerous' and 'government should new introduce driving rules'. Frequent structural errors make the meaning difficult to decipher at times, and simple sentences heavily outweigh any successful attempts at complex forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.