Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this contemporary era, digital devices have become part and parcel of our lives. It is often seen drivers can divert their mind when they use phones during driving.It is often argued whether it should be illegal or not. After examining this issue, this essay will articulate my strongly agreement views on this notion in upcoming paragraphs along with suitable example.

Ostensibly, there are numerous factors which will favour the given assertion. Predominanlty, It allows drivers to stop using phones while driving. To elaborate it, since legislation implement srtingent laws regarding this, it will instil fear of legal actions among the drivers. As result they will avoid using phones while driving to escaped from becoming criminal. Therefore, authorities should take rigorous actions against the dwellers who are glued towards smartphones while driving.

Furthermore, there is an another benefit of banning phones while driving is reduction in the inevitable accidents. Delving deeper, dint of overuse of cell phones while driving causes hazardous accidents. As people spend their time on phone , they indubitably forget to follow the traffic rules which results in fatal accidents, serious injury. Owing to this, they not only put their own lives into danger but also inculcate others innocent individuals into catastrophic circumstances without their guilty. It is illustrated by an instance, since law has introduced to minimise the uses of phones, accident cases have decreased over the last years. Thus policymakers ought to enforce safety measures in order to curb the vehicle collisions.

To summarise, although completely prohibition on looking at gadgets while driving make people frustrate for short- period of time but it will facilitate them not being witnessed of unexpected incidents that may jeopardise their lives.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position agreeing with the prompt that cell phone use while driving should be made illegal. Relevant ideas are introduced, such as the deterrent effect of legislation and the reduction of accidents, fulfilling the requirements for the mid-bands. However, some ideas remain slightly under-developed or repetitive, such as the general mention that drivers forget to follow traffic rules. To reach a higher level, the arguments would need deeper extension and more fully articulated examples rather than relying on generalised statements about safety measures and collisions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear paragraph-by-paragraph structure that guides the reader through the introduction, body arguments, and conclusion. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Ostensibly', 'Predominantly', and 'Furthermore', but their application can occasionally feel mechanical or slightly awkward within the sentence flow. Referencing is generally clear, though occasional transitional lapses appear, such as 'To elaborate it, since legislation implement'. Achieving a higher band would require more natural, seamless transitions and a more sophisticated management of cohesive relationships between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'contemporary era', 'legislation', 'rigorous actions', and 'catastrophic circumstances'. However, there are noticeable limitations and inaccuracies in word choice, collocation, and spelling that reflect a mid-level band profile. Examples of these errors include 'strongly agreement views', 'Predominanlty', 'srtingent', 'escaped', 'dint of overuse', and 'inculcate others innocent individuals'. While communication is maintained despite these flaws, frequent word-choice and spelling slips prevent the writing from achieving a higher lexical score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writing demonstrates a mix of simple and some complex sentence forms, though attempts at complex structures frequently contain grammatical errors. There are noticeable issues with verb forms, subject-verb agreement, articles, and prepositions within grammatical patterns, such as 'drivers can divert their mind when they use phones during driving', 'legislation implement', 'As result', and 'since law has introduced'. Errors in grammar and punctuation occur with some frequency and occasionally cause the reader to pause, though they do not completely impede overall communication. A higher band would require a greater proportion of error-free sentences and tighter control over complex grammatical structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.