Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The question of whether the use of cell phones should be made illegal while driving is widely debated among people. While some people argue that it should be permissible because drivers have to use phone for navigation purposes, I strongly agree with this point of view because the use of mobile phone while driving can cause serious accidents.

There are various negative outcomes of this activity. Firstly, driving is all about the concentration on road and keep everyone safe on the road. Lapses in concentration can cause serious accidents which can result is grave consequences such as loss of life, or severe physical injury. To avoid this, the idea of banning mobile phone while driving is highly appreciated by people. The study reveals that the reason behind the 85% of road accidents is continuous use of mobile phone while driving. Therefore, the banning the use of phone while driving can save precious lives of general public.

Acknowledging that people might need to use mobile phone while driving in case of emergency or navigating their way using maps, but the downsides of this development is far more dangerous compared to its' uses. People can use alternative measures such as phone holders of voice navigation to find their way, but the use of mobile phones should be strictly prohibited. Authorities need to impose heavy punishments and fines on the violators and start campaigns to aware people about the grave consequences of this practice.

In conclusion, I largely agree with the argument that use of cell phone should be banned while driving to avoid dangerous accidents on the roads. If authoritise were to minimize the risk of roads accidents, than along with imposing a ban, they would need to educate people about the dangerous outcomes of this practice.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion: you strongly support making phone use illegal while driving. You address the opposing point about navigation and emergencies, then explain why you consider the risks greater and suggest alternatives, penalties, and public campaigns. The discussion of concentration, crashes, injury, and loss of life is relevant, and the accident statistic is used to support your case. This meets the task well. To strengthen the response further, develop the evidence and examples more carefully: the claim that 85% of accidents result from phone use is broad and unsupported, and the navigation point could be explored in more detail, such as distinguishing hands-free directions from handling a phone.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present reasons and address a counterargument, and the conclusion restates your position. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Therefore,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument, and the progression from distraction to possible consequences is logical. Some cohesion is less controlled, however. The opening says “While some people argue” but then “I strongly agree with this point of view,” which makes the position sound as though you agree with the opposing view. The third paragraph also begins with “Acknowledging that” but does not form a complete sentence. Make links between ideas more precise and vary transitions so the argument feels less formulaic.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “lapses in concentration,” “grave consequences,” “navigation,” “alternative measures,” and “impose heavy punishments.” These choices communicate the main ideas and show attempts to use more formal language. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “the concentration on road,” “the reason behind the 85%,” “campaigns to aware people,” and “dangerous outcomes.” There are also spelling errors in “authoritise.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and naturalness. Aim for established combinations such as “concentrate on the road,” “raise public awareness,” and “road accidents,” and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including a concession in “While some people argue…” and conditional phrasing in the conclusion. The main message remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make relationships between ideas unclear. For example, “Acknowledging that people might need…” is a dependent opening without a main clause, while “the downsides … is” has subject–verb disagreement. Other examples include “the banning the use” and “If authoritise were to minimize … than,” where article or clause construction needs correction. Practise building complete sentences after introductory participle phrases and checking agreement and conditional patterns. More consistently accurate complex sentences would make your argument easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.