Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Road mishappenings are quite prevalent these days, and the usage of mobile phone while driving is one contributing factor to this deadly phenomenon. There is a strong belief that cell phone use should be banned for drivers. I, however, strongly assert that the aforementioned notion holds true, provided there are a few exceptions.

Admittedly, it is the basic responsibility of drivers to be safe on the road in whatever way they can; nevertheless, a large number of vehicle operators are seen relying excessively on their smartphones for their entertainment, time utilization, and sometimes to avoid boredom while driving. To cite an example, rarely do a truck driver on his long haul restrict himself using mobile phone. This, in turn, leads to diversion of mind, which begings to perform multiple tasks. As a result, major terrible accidents happen on road, putting the lives of various individuals on risk.

Nonetheless, a complete abandonment is definitely not fair. If a motorist, for example, wants to ensure the route of his travel, he might need a digital map, for which using mobile phone becomes mandatory. Moreover, sometimes a situation of emergency arises, and the driver will have to use his mobile phone at that occasion, no matter what. Having scrutinized these factors, it can rightly be said that usage of phones is legitimate for drivers, but under certain conditions. It should be best tried that the operator parks the vehicle first to use his phone unless there is an emergency.

To encapsulate, granted, operating a smartphone while driving is quite dangerous, strictly banning the mobile phone on road is not a panacea for all cases. Therefore, meaningful usage of cellular phone is not detrimental, and one should be mindful of using it to the bare minimum while driving.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you agree that phone use is dangerous but argue against an absolute ban, allowing limited use for navigation or emergencies. This addresses the question and is supported with relevant examples, including drivers using phones for entertainment and a motorist needing a digital map. However, the case for exceptions is less fully developed than the case for restriction. The emergency example is asserted rather than explained, and the response could distinguish safer options, such as stopping before making a call, from using a phone while the vehicle is moving. The conclusion restates your position effectively. More precise explanation of how your exceptions fit with the proposed law would make the response more fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall progression: it introduces your qualified agreement, explains the dangers, considers exceptions, and concludes with a recommendation. Paragraphing supports this structure, and signposts such as “Admittedly,” “Nonetheless,” and “To encapsulate” help readers follow the shift between points. Some linking is slightly mechanical, however, and a few references are not fully precise. For example, “This, in turn” refers broadly to drivers’ phone use, while “at that occasion” points back to an emergency without a clear antecedent. The final paragraph also repeats the central contrast rather than adding a final implication. Varying transitions and making references more explicit would strengthen the otherwise logical progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a reasonably broad range, including topic-specific terms such as “diversion of mind,” “digital map,” “complete abandonment,” and “panacea.” These choices show an effort to express nuanced ideas, and the meaning is generally clear. Some less common expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision: “road mishappenings” is not the usual term, “time utilization” sounds awkward in this context, and “major terrible accidents” is imprecise. There are also spelling errors, including “begings,” and some collocations such as “putting the lives … on risk.” Aim for natural, accurate combinations rather than elevated wording for its own sake; this will make your vocabulary more flexible and convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including concession and conditional clauses: “Admittedly …; nevertheless …” and “If a motorist … wants to ensure the route …, he might need a digital map.” These help communicate a qualified position, and errors rarely prevent understanding. Some grammatical inaccuracies remain. For example, “rarely do a truck driver … restrict himself” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “the operator parks the vehicle first to use his phone unless there is an emergency” creates an unclear relationship between the recommendation and exception. Article and number choices also need attention in phrases such as “a situation of emergency.” Review agreement and clause relationships, and check each sentence for clear, complete grammatical connections.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.