Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Road carnage has been a world-wide disaster and among many other reasons, the use of mobile phones while driving has been greatly mentioned as a major cause. I therefore strongly agree that cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal because it leads to lose of lives. In addition, using mobile phones can inconvinience other users plying the same route.

To begin with, drivers who use mobile phones on the roads risk their lives and those of passengers. Their inability to concentrate will ultimately be met with serious consequences such as falling into ditches, hitting poles along the road and even bumbs which should regulate their speeding. For instance, a driver could be logged into their social media accounts and watching videos which will take off their concentration from the road. This action will definately pose risks to the people onboard.

Furthermore, using electronic devices while driving causes inconviniences to other road users. This results from lack of adherance to traffic lights and speed limits. The thought to alter the speeed to suit a specific region may not arise at that moment and may cause unnecessary delays to others. Even after messing up, the accused driver may fail to recognise their mistakes, making repeatition of such actions inevitable. To illustrate this, a driver who fails to observe traffic rules will likely get to lanes which are not designated for them. This can lead to traffic congestion and delays to their colleagues.

To sum up, I strongly support the idea that proper measures should be put in place to ensure drivers do not use their mobile phones while at work because it risks lives and causes inconviniences to other citizens. Apart from legal policies, fines ought to be charged on such individuals so that road accidents are reduced.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly agree that drivers’ phone use should be illegal, and the conclusion reinforces this view while proposing fines. You give relevant reasons about danger to drivers and passengers and inconvenience to other road users, with examples such as a driver watching videos and failing to use the correct lane. This addresses the task, but the reasons are not developed equally. The first example explains distraction, whereas the discussion of delays and lane use is less clearly connected to phone use, and the claim that phones “lead to lose of lives” would benefit from a specific explanation or example. Develop each main point with a clearer cause-and-effect link and support.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs signposted by “To begin with” and “Furthermore,” and a concluding summary. The ideas generally progress from risks to passengers to effects on other road users, and examples help illustrate both points. This gives the essay a coherent arrangement. To make the progression more fluent, ensure that each example directly supports the paragraph’s main claim: the lane example, for instance, needs a clearer link to phone distraction. Some connections are also mechanical, with repeated transitions such as “For instance” and “To illustrate this.” Use a wider range of natural links and clearer referencing so the reader can follow how each consequence develops.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-specific vocabulary, including “road carnage,” “traffic lights,” “speed limits,” “traffic congestion,” and “legal policies.” These choices show awareness of the subject, but control is uneven, and several spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less precise. Examples include “inconvinience,” “adherance,” “speeed,” and “repeatition”; “bumps which should regulate their speeding” is also unclear, while “colleagues” is not a natural term for other road users. Some phrases, such as “alter the speed to suit a specific region,” do not express the intended idea clearly. Aim for accurate spelling and more natural collocations, especially when describing road rules and the consequences of distraction.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including the conditional structure “A driver who fails to observe traffic rules will likely…” and the result clause “This can lead to traffic congestion and delays.” Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors reduce accuracy. For example, “leads to lose of lives” needs a noun construction (“leads to loss of life”), and “the accused driver may fail to recognise their mistakes” has an unclear reference and number relationship. In “the thought to alter the speeed … may not arise,” the sentence structure is awkward and difficult to follow. Review noun forms, agreement, and clause construction, and check punctuation around longer sentences to make your meaning consistently clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.