Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In this current era , cell phones play a vital role in every individuals life . Using the cell phones while doinv driving is quite dangours beacuse it creates distraction whenever a person is doing drive . Due to which it will make the case of accident . I m fully agree with the statement , while doing driving, the mobile phone should be illegal for the drivers .

I have a experince of this thing . one of my friend is donig driving on the main highway . At that time , he was on phone call with his friend . and suddenly he distract beacuse of phone call and his car is touched with another car and he is stuck in accident situation . At that time , not only my friend injured also another car boy was got injury . Due to which , cell phone will be illegal while donig driving . Sometime it can be seen that , there is a much traffic on highways still , Driver using mobile phone whcih is not a good thinh . it will be bacole the reason of someones injury or death .

i m fully agree with statement . according to me , sometimes its important phone calls . i fully understand . That time driver can pick the call otherwisr drivers should be not allowed to pock up any call and using or giving fouce on call phone . Therefore , it will prove benefical for each pthers

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you fully agree that drivers should not use phones, and the highway accident involving your friend is relevant support. You also acknowledge that calls can sometimes be important, which begins to address a possible counterargument. However, the response develops its case mainly through this single example and repeated claims that phone use causes injury or death. The point about heavy traffic is introduced but not explained, and the exception for important calls is left unclear: should drivers answer, or wait until they have stopped safely? To strengthen the response, explain the risks more fully and clarify how a legal ban could allow emergencies to be handled safely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation: you state your view first, give an accident example, and then return to your opinion. This makes the general direction understandable. However, the progression is not consistently clear, and ideas are often joined mechanically with phrases such as “Due to which” and “At that time.” The final paragraph repeats “I m fully agree” rather than developing a distinct concluding point. Some references are also unclear, particularly “it will prove benefical for each pthers,” where the reader cannot easily identify what “it” refers to. Use separate paragraphs for your position, supporting reasons, and conclusion, and connect each point with clear cause-and-effect links.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “distracted,” “highways,” “accident,” and “injury,” so the main subject is recognisable. However, the range is limited and several expressions are repeated, especially “phone,” “driver,” and “accident.” Frequent spelling errors and inaccurate word choices—such as “dangours,” “thinh,” and “fouce”—make parts of the response difficult to read. Some phrases are also unnatural, including “doing drive” and “the case of accident.” Build a more precise set of collocations for this topic and check spelling carefully. For example, describe a driver as “using a phone while driving” and say that a collision “caused injuries.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response communicates a basic opinion and attempts to connect ideas in longer sentences, for example, “At that time, he was on phone call with his friend.” However, the range of sentence structures is limited, and attempts to combine events often contain errors that make the sequence hard to follow: “he suddenly distract” and “his car is touched with another car.” Verb forms and tense are frequently inconsistent, as in “he is stuck in accident situation,” while articles and sentence boundaries are also often missing or misplaced. Practise forming accurate past-tense sentences to narrate the accident, and use complete, controlled sentences before attempting longer structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.