Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often argued that using mobile phones while driving should be prohibited, as it can cause the distraction to drivers. While there are some unfavourable argumemts, I agree with this viewpoint that mobile phone hsould be banned while driving.

Undoubtedly, there are some people think that mobile phones should be used during driving. This is mainly because sometimes they need assistance for emergecies and check the map for their destinations. For instance, when a driver is driving in car, he get a call from his family regarding personal and professional proposes, he should be allowed to take the urgent calls. Many trcuk drivers ususally spend a prolonged time away from their families, and they hardily get a chance to stay in touch with their families.

However, in my view, use of smart phone could be dangerous for many people if they use it while driving. One of the key reasons is that it could become a cause of accidents on road. When a driver use a cell phone, he/she more likely to get distracted by phone. Consequently, instead of focusing on driver they are more likely to focus on their mobile phone which could increase the rate of accidents on roads. To illustrate, in India, the main cause of road accidents is use of mobile phone road as usaully people get distracted, especiaaly youngters. In order to get escape from this accidental incidents, there are stringent rules nad hefty fines are imposed on those individuals who use the cell phone while driving.

In conclusion, although some individuals think that use of mobile phone should be allowed on road to answer the important calls and messages, I agree with this viewpoint to ban the use of cell phone on roads.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I agree” that phone use should be banned—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You address both the opposing view and your own reasons, including urgent calls and the risk of accidents, so the response covers the task. The accident-prevention argument is the more developed point, with an explanation of distraction and an example referring to India. By contrast, the case for allowing calls is less fully examined, and the example about truck drivers does not explain why a complete ban would be inappropriate or how emergencies could be handled safely. To strengthen the response, develop both sides more evenly and make the examples precise and directly connected to your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting the opposing view, a paragraph supporting your position, and a conclusion. The contrast signalled by “However” and the summary beginning “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. The main progression is logical, but some links between ideas are mechanical or unclear. For example, the sentence beginning “Consequently” repeats the idea of distraction without clearly distinguishing the driver’s attention from the road, and “To illustrate” introduces a broad claim rather than a specific example. The reference to “these accidental incidents” is also not very precise. Use clearer links between each reason and its consequence, and make pronouns and references unambiguous.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “prohibited,” “distracted,” “urgent calls,” “accidents,” and “hefty fines.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “One of the key reasons.” However, the range and control are limited by frequent spelling errors and awkward or inaccurate word combinations. Examples include “argumemts,” “emergecies,” “hardily,” and “accidental incidents”; phrases such as “personal and professional proposes” and “use of mobile phone road” are difficult to interpret. These errors sometimes make the reader pause, even though your main meaning is generally recoverable. Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning natural collocations, such as “cause a distraction” and “road accidents.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession in “although some individuals think…” and a conditional structure in “if they use it while driving.” The overall meaning is usually understandable, but errors in sentence construction and verb forms occur across the response. For example, “there are some people think” needs a relative clause or a different structure, while “when a driver… he get a call” has subject–verb agreement problems. In “When a driver use… he/she more likely to get distracted,” the verb form and missing auxiliary affect accuracy. Some sentences also have unclear grammatical relationships, particularly the long example about truck drivers. Practise accurate clause formation, agreement, and complete verb phrases while retaining your attempts at complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.