Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In this fast movie era, usage of mobiles is boosting as a conquesces people use cell phone while driving which become dangerous for life. Therefore use of phone during driving should be illegal. I strongly support this statement. This nation and my opinion will justified with proper explation in upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, to support the rule, to make use of cell phone while driving is illegal main reason is this can lead to serious road accidents or even deaths.To explain it, if driver use phone during driving, they can lost the contral or may take their eyes off from the road while lead to road accident. For example, survey held by DSP officer of gujarat police, result shoes that out of 20 , 14 road acident is caused because of use of cell phone by drivers.

Another reason to support this statement, using mobile driver may become distracts by calls and messages. Consequently, driver miis the road signs , miss the exit not only this, driver may cause sudden break or dangerous lane changes, increasing the risk of accidents.

However, there is a positve side of using mobile while driving. To elobrate it, mobile used for nevigate the driver with the help of Google maps, also thses app provide updates on traffice as well as alternatvir routes.To illustrate it, In Canada all driver use mobile phone for nevigation as road network is too big .

In conclusion, use of mobile for neviation is positve side but risk of accident, suddent break or dangerous lane changes cause even death becasue of use of cell phone. Therefore , for the safety of peoplr use of mobile for drivers sholud be illegal.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: “I strongly support this statement,” and the conclusion returns to the view that phone use by drivers should be illegal. You address the main safety argument with possible accidents and deaths, and add relevant examples such as distraction from calls and messages. The navigation paragraph also recognises a counterpoint, showing awareness of both sides. This meets the task well, but development is uneven: the accident statistic is presented without context or explanation, while the navigation benefit is asserted broadly rather than weighed against the danger or linked to a practical exception. To strengthen the response further, explain how the evidence supports your position and clarify whether hands-free or navigation use should also be prohibited.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two paragraphs supporting the restriction, a counterargument, and a conclusion. Sequencing phrases such as “To begin with,” “Another reason,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, and some links are unclear. For example, “This nation and my opinion will justified” does not clearly connect the introduction to the argument, and the second body paragraph moves through several consequences without explaining their relationship. The counterargument is relevant but its connection to your final position could be clearer. Use fewer formulaic openings and build each paragraph around one central point, with clear explanation and a concluding link to your overall view.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “road accidents,” “distracted,” “road signs,” “lane changes,” and “traffic,” so the reader can identify the subject and your main ideas. However, the range and control are limited, with frequent spelling errors and inaccurate word choices that sometimes make meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “conquesces,” “contral,” “miis,” and “nevi(g)ation,” as well as awkward phrases such as “fast movie era” and “positve side.” Some expressions are repeated, particularly “use of mobile” and “road accident.” Build a more accurate set of collocations for this topic and proofread spelling; precise phrases such as “mobile-phone use while driving” and “cause a collision” would make the argument clearer and more formal.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including conditional reasoning in “if driver use phone during driving” and a result clause beginning “Consequently.” This shows an effort to explain causes and effects, but control is inconsistent: many sentences contain errors in verb forms, articles, agreement, or sentence construction. For instance, “they can lost the contral” needs a base verb after “can,” and “driver may become distracts” has an incorrect verb form. The opening sentence also has an unclear structure, while punctuation is inconsistent, with missing spaces after full stops and commas. Practise forming accurate conditional sentences and checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and verb patterns. More reliable sentence structures will help your ideas come across without requiring the reader to interpret them.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.