Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In today's world cell phone is very important part of a person's life. They carry with them every time and while driving people use mobile phone to surfing on instagram and other social networking sites. This is a very dangerous phenomen because it cause many fatal accidents on the road and laws should me made to ban it completely. And i am agree that while driving mobile phone should made illegal.

When we driving at a speed of 60 mp/h and if we don't drive with caution on the road there is a high chance that we might be involved in some type of collision on the road. People generally use phone while driving because they think they can manage both with equal concentration but they don't know that while doing this they can cause fatal injuries to both parties at the time of collision.

Secondly, while driving using phone they can jump the red light and by doing so an innocent life on the footpath can be taken. some years ago one of my close friend get life threatning injuries on his body which he will not able to cure for the rest of life.

In the end, I just want to say that the laws should be made more stringent and if the person involved in an accident where he/she is using the phone and the fact is established,then there should be a punishment that the person can never use phone while driving.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that phone use while driving should be illegal, and you give relevant reasons, including reduced concentration, collisions, and the risk to pedestrians. The example of your friend’s serious injuries also supports the argument. However, some points are less fully developed: the opening focuses on social media use, while the later paragraphs do not explain why a complete ban is preferable to other restrictions. Your conclusion proposes a permanent driving ban for offenders, but this is not clearly connected to the broader policy you support. The response is five words below the required minimum, so it does not meet the task’s length requirement. Develop the policy argument and explain the example’s relevance more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs give reasons, and a final paragraph offers a recommendation. Sequencing words such as “Secondly” and “In the end” help signal progression. However, the connection between ideas is sometimes unclear or mechanical. For example, the first body paragraph moves from driving speed to concentration and then to injuries without clearly explaining each link. The friend’s accident is introduced abruptly, and “In the end” leads to a new punishment proposal rather than a concise summary. Use clearer links between claims and examples, and organise each body paragraph around one main point supported by explanation.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “fatal accidents,” “collision,” “concentration,” “red light,” and “punishment,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, such as “life-threatening injuries.” However, word choice, spelling, and collocation errors are noticeable: “phenomen” should be “phenomenon,” “laws should me made” contains an incorrect word, and “life threatning injuries” is misspelled. Phrases such as “surfing on instagram” and “cure” for injuries are not natural in this context. Aim for more precise collocations and check spelling, especially in key topic vocabulary, to make your meaning clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “if we don’t drive with caution … there is a high chance,” and you use clauses to explain consequences. However, errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction are frequent enough to affect accuracy. Examples include “When we driving,” “it cause,” “I am agree,” and “one of my close friend get.” The final sentence is also difficult to control because its conditional clause and proposed consequence are joined into a long structure. Practise accurate present-tense forms and subject–verb agreement, and divide longer ideas into shorter sentences. Careful punctuation and proofreading would also improve readability.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.