Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Using a cell phone while driving is dangerous because it causes the driver to become distracted. Therefore, cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is irrefutable to say that cell phone has become a neccessity today. People are often seen using their phones everywhere while driving, sitting in a bus, in toilets and at many places. There is an ongoing debate going on that cell phone use by drivers should be made illegal as it can distract the driver while driving. I completely agree with the above statement. I am going to putforth my views in upcoming pargraphs supporting above statement.

To begin with, a person can harm someone if using phone during driving. To illustrate: accidents can take place when driver is distracted and can put another indiviual's life at risk. A small or big accident definitely marks a big impact on mental and physical health of victim and their family members as accidents can result in fractures and sometimes death too. Moreover, cell phone use while driving diverts driver's attention that unfortunately lead them to miss turns and signals on road. Consequently, it increases their travel time and make them pay fines for disobeying traffic rules.

Probing further, emergency vehicles like fire extinguishers, ambulances and police can reach late at called spot because of a driver who is not attentive and busy using cell phone on road, providing no space to vehicles to cross and reach early. Additionally, it will cause more traffic on road too.

To recapitulate, cell phone use should be completely prohobited to drivers as it increases numerous issues like accidents, delays and traffic on road. Drivers should stop their vehicle on side if in need to use phone but not on road.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I completely agree”) and remains consistent in the conclusion. You give relevant reasons, including accident risks, missed signals, delays to emergency vehicles and increased traffic, and you explain some consequences for victims and their families. This addresses the task well overall. However, some points are less fully developed: for example, the claim that phone use increases travel time and causes fines is asserted rather than explained, and the emergency-vehicle example would be stronger with a specific scenario or supporting detail. To strengthen the response further, develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or concrete example, and make the case for a legal ban more explicit rather than relying mainly on the dangers of distraction.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Ideas generally progress from direct harm to wider effects, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Moreover” and “To recapitulate” help readers follow the argument. This gives the essay coherent organisation. At times, however, linking is mechanical or the relationship between ideas is not fully clear. The emergency-vehicle point, for instance, is introduced as a further consequence but is not closely connected to the preceding discussion of distraction. Some references, such as “it” in “it increases their travel time,” could also be clearer. Use fewer formulaic transitions and make the links between each claim and its explanation more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main argument, including “distracted,” “traffic rules,” “emergency vehicles” and “disobeying.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “To recapitulate.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision: “ongoing debate going on” is repetitive, “called spot” is not idiomatic, and “fire extinguishers” names equipment rather than emergency vehicles. Spelling errors such as “neccessity,” “indiviual's” and “prohobited” are noticeable. Aim for accurate, natural combinations and check spelling carefully; a smaller set of well-controlled expressions will make the argument sound more fluent and formal.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including a conditional idea in “if using phone during driving” and a relative clause in “a driver who is not attentive.” Most of the meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make relationships unclear. For example, “cell phone use while driving diverts driver's attention that unfortunately lead them” has problems with the article, the relative construction and subject–verb agreement. In “it increases their travel time and make them pay fines,” the verbs do not agree in form. There are also sentence-boundary and punctuation issues, such as the colon after “To illustrate.” Practise building accurate clauses and checking agreement, articles and verb forms before adding complexity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.