Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people feel that the government should pay the costs of running universities so that a university education will be free for anyone who wants it.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
some individuals believe that authorties should provide free education, so that everyone get opportunity to learn regardless of financial situation.while I agree with that government should provide free education for substantial economic growth and equal platform for everone. I do not think that it should be completely free for everyone. I will elaborate both reason in upcoming paragraph.
The prominent reason why regime should provide a free higer eduction is the most crucial factor that is economic growth and equal access to higer studies for every student.To explain it, if govenment will provide education free of cost it would be benefical to economy .Not only economic growth , but also less financial stress plays a vital role in learning.For example, free education can help to bring more bright students forwards and those individual can contribute to different kind progress in society.As a result, there will be educated person in particular country that make effort to develop the nation.
On the other hand,making university education lead to unnecessary burden on government.Because higher education is expensive but everyone do not free education.Moreover, public fund will be used by regime to make eduction free as these funds are priority for schools, heathcare and other transport facilties to the people.A more balance approch woukd be provicde a subsidise education and provide financial assistance to targeted students for substainable growth.
In conclusion,
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You present a relevant, partly qualified position: you support public funding for access and economic growth, but argue that university should not be entirely free for everyone. The points about reducing financial stress, enabling talented students to contribute, and competing demands on public funds address the question. However, these ideas are brief and general; for example, the claim that graduates will “develop the nation” would be stronger with a specific explanation or example. Your proposed compromise of subsidies and targeted assistance is useful but needs more detail. The conclusion is unfinished (“In conclusion,”), so the response does not fully complete the task. It also falls short of the stated minimum length, limiting the opportunity to develop and support your position.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting free access, a counterargument, and an attempted conclusion. The contrast signalled by “On the other hand” helps show the shift in viewpoint, and the ideas are generally relevant to their paragraphs. However, progression is limited because each point is stated briefly rather than developed through explanation and evidence. Some links are mechanical or unclear, such as “Not only economic growth, but also less financial stress,” and the opening sentence of the second body paragraph is difficult to follow. The final paragraph contains only “In conclusion,” leaving the argument without a closing summary. Develop each paragraph around a clear main point and use linking expressions to show precise relationships between ideas.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You attempt vocabulary suited to the topic, including “economic growth,” “financial stress,” “public fund,” “financial assistance,” and “sustainable growth.” These choices show an effort to discuss both benefits and costs of university funding. However, spelling errors and inaccurate word choices are frequent enough to distract the reader, as in “authorties,” “higer eduction,” “facilties,” and “substainable.” Some phrases are also unnatural or unclear, including “bring more bright students forwards” and “different kind progress.” Build accuracy with common academic collocations and check spelling carefully. A more precise range would also help distinguish between free tuition, subsidies, and targeted financial support rather than repeating broad terms such as “free education.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure (“if government will provide education…”) and the paired construction “Not only…but also.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence structure, verb forms, agreement, articles, and punctuation sometimes make the meaning difficult to follow. For example, “everyone get opportunity” lacks agreement and an article, while “everyone do not free education” is not a complete, clear grammatical construction. The opening sentence also runs several clauses together without appropriate sentence boundaries. Practise forming accurate conditional sentences and checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete clauses. Shorter, correctly punctuated sentences would make your reasoning easier to understand while you build confidence with complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.