Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people feel that the government should pay the costs of running universities so that a university education will be free for anyone who wants it.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Proponents of people argue that university education should be completely free, putting a side the social rank of students. I am inclined to believe that the government should fund universities every year, chiefly because there are a lot of disadvantaged students in this current world, and also it would encourage the education which would result in the local economy.

The principal justification for this stance is that it would allow unfortune and disadvantaged students to continue their higher education and this stems from the fact that when universities are free all categories of people can study no matter how wealthy the student's family is, a perminent example is any poor person from a rural place with great ambitions would be capable to join any university he is interested in and finish his studies comfortably.

Furthermore, the government funding plays a pivotal role in the economy power of the country, as long as the percentage of learners is significantly rising this would be result beneficially in the economy power, to be specific the country would witness several invention and developments due to the considerable number of brains that studied freely and recieved a good training and preparation to be well prepared for the work force. for instance there is a study has shown that the highest IQ in the most of societies are in the poorest areas, and this shows how crucial it is for government to invest in this category.

In conclusion, i maintain that the government should make university education free for all students, given that it would allow poor students to carry their studies as well as it would benefit the country economy.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you support government funding so that university is free, and the conclusion restates this view. You address the main issue with two relevant reasons: improving access for disadvantaged students and benefiting the national economy through a more educated workforce. The rural student example helps illustrate the first point. However, the economic argument is less fully explained: the link between more graduates and economic growth is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the reference to a study about IQ in poor areas is vague and not clearly connected to the claim. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation or a specific, credible example to make the response more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. Sequencing expressions such as “Furthermore,” “to be specific,” and “In conclusion” help signal the direction of the argument. Some connections, however, are mechanical or unclear. The long sentence beginning “Furthermore, the government funding…” combines several claims, making the relationship between education, inventions, and economic growth difficult to follow. The phrase “as long as” also does not clearly express the intended cause-and-effect link. Use shorter sentences to separate claims and explanations, and make references such as “this” point unmistakably to the idea they summarise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “disadvantaged students,” “pivotal role,” “considerable number,” and “work force.” These choices show an effort to express ideas beyond basic terms, but inaccurate word choice, collocation, and spelling sometimes make the argument less natural. For example, “economy power” is not an idiomatic phrase, “unfortune” is incorrectly formed, and “perminent” and “recieved” are misspelled. “Invention and developments” also needs more precise wording. Build accuracy by learning common academic collocations and checking spelling and word forms; this will let your ideas come across more clearly without relying on awkward phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple statements and more complex structures, including a reason clause with “because” and a conditional example beginning “when universities are free.” The main argument remains understandable, but some sentence structures and punctuation need more control. The sentence beginning “The principal justification…” runs several ideas together, while “as long as the percentage of learners is significantly rising this would be result…” has an unclear grammatical relationship between its clauses. There are also errors in articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries, such as the lowercase “for instance” after a full stop and “a study has shown” in this context. Separate long sentences and check clause structure, verb forms, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.