Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-07-31
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people feel that the government should pay the costs of running universities so that a university education will be free for anyone who wants it.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 7.0)
There has been many debates regarding university education. People argue whether universities should be run by the government of not. In this essay, I will discuss the pros and cons of this.
If tertiary education is handled by government, it becomes more attainable by everybody, specially those lower income families. Parents need not worry on the tuition of their children. They would worry only on the boarding or transportation of their children, and the daily pocket money for food. In the Philippines, the state universities have become free during the time of President Duterte. Many students from the provinces availed of this. After graduating, they were able to help their families. Furthermore, with government in control of universities, they are able to implement standardized curriculum. There will not be much comparison among the schools. Nowadays, students would prefer one school over the other saying this school offers better education. This comparison will be eliminated if every university is under the same government.
On the other hand, if the universities are independent, it is more competitive for the students. Students will struggle to be able to get in. They will work hard in high school to be able to get a slot in their preferred university. Additionally, independent universities can get more funding with the right sponsors. They are able to gather sponsorship through different organizations and are able to improve their facilities without waiting for approvals from different government agencies.
I agree that higher education will be free, although I suggest that there will still be a strict selection process. Students must work hard to reach a certain mark so they will be allowed to stay. Otherwise, there will be consequences. This way, the government is sure that students who are in their universities are the deserving ones and not simply forced by their parents because it is free.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Overall | 7.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0
Tinutugunan ng sagot ang lahat ng bahagi ng prompt, na nagbibigay ng malinaw na posisyon na sumusuporta sa government-funded education habang isinusulong ang merit-based selection process. Ang mga ideya ay may kaugnayan at suportado ng isang tiyak na halimbawa mula sa Pilipinas. Gayunpaman, ang pagpapalawig ay medyo hindi pantay; ang argumento tungkol sa standardized curricula ay medyo simple, at ang transisyon sa counter-argument ay maikli. Para maabot ang mas mataas na band, dapat mong palawigin ang mga implikasyon ng iyong mga ideya, gaya ng kung paano maaaring makaapekto ang government funding sa kalidad ng pananaliksik o ang pangmatagalang benepisyong pang-ekonomiya ng isang mas edukadong workforce, sa halip na magpokus lamang sa tuition costs.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
Ang sanaysay ay lohikal na naka-organisa na may malinaw na introduksyon, body paragraphs, at konklusyon. Ang bawat talata ay may sentral na tema. Gumamit ng mga cohesive devices tulad ng 'Furthermore', 'On the other hand', at 'Additionally', na nakakatulong sa paggabay sa mambabasa. Gayunpaman, ang ilang transisyon ay medyo mekanikal, at ang pag-refer sa mga ideya ay maaaring maging mas sopistikado. Halimbawa, ang koneksyon sa pagitan ng pangalawa at pangatlong talata ay maaaring maging mas swabe para mas maipakita ang pagkakaiba ng dalawang pananaw. Sa kabuuan, malinaw ang daloy ng mga ideya at ang paghahati sa mga talata ay angkop para sa gawain.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
Nagpapakita ka ng sapat na lawak ng bokabularyo para sa gawain, gamit ang mga terminong tulad ng 'tertiary education', 'standardized curriculum', at 'merit-based'. May ilang maliliit na pagkakamali sa pagpili ng salita, gaya ng 'handled by government' sa halip na 'funded by the government' o 'government-subsidized'. Bagama't sapat ang bokabularyo para malinaw na maiparating ang iyong kahulugan, kulang ito sa presisyon at pagkakaiba-iba ng mga hindi gaanong karaniwang salita na magtatakda sa isang mas mataas na band. Ang pagpokus sa mga collocation at mas akademikong pagpapahayag ay makakatulong para mapataas ang iyong score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5
Gumagamit ang sanaysay ng halo ng simple at komplikadong istruktura ng pangungusap. May ilang mga grammatical error, tulad ng 'There has been many debates' (subject-verb agreement) at 'tuition of their children' (pagpili ng preposition). Bukod pa rito, ang 'government of not' ay isang pagkakamali sa pagpapahayag. Bagama't kapansin-pansin ang mga pagkakamaling ito, hindi nito nahahadlangan ang komunikasyon. Para mag-improve, magpokus sa subject-verb agreement at tamang paggamit ng mga article at preposition. Ang pagdaragdag ng iba't ibang komplikadong istruktura, tulad ng paggamit ng mas maraming conditional o passive constructions, ay makakatulong din.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.