Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Barron's Writing · 2026-08-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people feel that the government should pay the costs of running universities so that a university education will be free for anyone who wants it.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Most people opine that universities should be funded by national authorities so everyone can get admission for free. I agree to this idea to fully extent as it will increase the literacy rate and reduce a crime rate. I will explain it in the upcoming paragraphs.

To start with, when there is a free education in the colleges and institutions then not only rich but also poor people who are willing to learn education, can take admission in the institutions which would help to boost literacy rate. Moreover, when each person in the nation is educated then there is a also possibility to decrease the crime rate as most of the criminal activities are happened due to shortage of jobs but after getting good education, people can find work opportunities easily. For example, New Zealand is the one literate nations in the world because of free education in universities.

To be continued, in most of western nations, there is a free education so people are also very intelligent and do not indulge into wrong activities. Furthermore, in foreign countries, where pupils are getting free education, can set up their own business which would help them financially so they do not need to look after jobs from government. As a result, people do not need to commit a crime in the sake of earning money or just for their livelihood.

In conclusion, some masses suggest that university study ought be free of cost for everyone and I am in the favor of this point because it would assist a nation to increase their literacy rate and lower the crime rate.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of free university education. The main ideas—increasing literacy and reducing crime—are relevant and supported with examples, such as the mention of New Zealand. However, the development is somewhat repetitive, particularly the argument regarding crime reduction, which is restated in both body paragraphs without significant new insight. While the position is consistent, the supporting arguments could be more nuanced to reach a higher band. The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points, ensuring the task requirements are met.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices such as 'To start with', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion' are used to guide the reader. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical or awkward, such as 'To be continued', which is not an appropriate phrase for an essay structure. Additionally, the referencing is occasionally unclear, and the flow between sentences could be smoother. Despite these minor issues, the overall progression of ideas is easy to follow, and the paragraphing is functional.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the student to express their ideas clearly. There are some attempts at less common vocabulary, such as 'opine' and 'indulge', though these are sometimes used in slightly unnatural collocations. There are also instances of repetitive word choice, such as the frequent use of 'education' and 'crime rate'. While the range is sufficient to communicate the message, it lacks the precision and flexibility required for higher bands. Spelling is generally accurate throughout the text.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'I agree to this idea to fully extent' (full extent), 'there is a also possibility' (there is also a possibility), and 'ought be' (ought to be). Subject-verb agreement and article usage are inconsistent, for example, 'New Zealand is the one literate nations'. While these errors are noticeable, they do not significantly impede communication. To improve, the student should focus on refining complex sentence structures and ensuring consistent use of articles and prepositions.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.