Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Barron's Writing · 2026-09-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people feel that the government should pay the costs of running universities so that a university education will be free for anyone who wants it.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

Although there are some drawbacks, I believe that the advantages are more significant. The main reason for this is that few individuals considered that lawmakers of the country pay all expensives to run the universities and their education system it's free for poor child and reasons to support my viewpoint.

To commence with, there are multifarious prominent is that authority person don't take fees

from poor category child. To explicate, they take a whole expensive whenever their studies is not completed and they focused on our studies properly. For instance, when they studies in public universities, they will get more opportunities to compare private colleges candidate and they get government jobs easily. Hence, they makes rules for our country, which is a good for country.

Furthermore, they are also develop sustainable stability in our society and promotes lower cast candidates. In other words, someone who believes in poor or rich category, that way of thinking is no more. To cite in epitume, public educational department collect the data by all over country and they see recently rapid increase in public universities . Before that some people takes admission in coaching centers but after the improvements they not take it.

As a result, past results are not good, but in Recents we see public universities candidates named in top academic scored in country.

In conclusion, dispite the potential disadvantages associated with this trend, I believe that it's advantages are considerably greater. Therefore, the overall impact of this development can be considered positive.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt regarding whether the government should fund universities to make education free. The student takes a clear position in the introduction and conclusion, stating that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. However, the development of ideas is limited and often repetitive. Phrases like 'poor child' and 'poor category child' are repeated without substantial expansion or varied supporting examples. While the essay touches on accessibility and job opportunities, the arguments lack depth and coherent elaboration. Consequently, the response aligns best with the Band 5 descriptors, as the task is addressed only partially with under-developed ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 4.0

The essay is divided into paragraphs, including an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the logical progression is frequently disrupted by unclear referencing and confusing transitions. For instance, phrases such as 'To commence with, there are multifarious prominent is that...' and 'To cite in epitume' are grammatically distorted and do not function effectively as cohesive devices. Pronoun referencing is also weak, as it is often difficult to determine whether 'they' refers to the government, lawmakers, or students. Because of these noticeable deficiencies in logical flow and cohesive management, a Band 4.0 score is appropriate.

Lexical Resource — Band 4.0

The vocabulary used throughout the essay is basic and repetitive, frequently impeded by severe word-choice errors and non-standard collocations. Examples include 'expensives' instead of 'expenses', 'poor category child', and 'in Recents we see'. The attempt to use less common vocabulary, such as 'multifarious' and 'epitume' (epitome), results in unnatural phrasing and misuse. Due to the limited vocabulary range and frequent lexical errors that cause strain for the reader, the response corresponds to Band 4.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.0

The grammatical structures attempted in the essay are frequently faulty and obscure the intended meaning. The text contains numerous basic and complex grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('few individuals considered that', 'they makes rules', 'some people takes'), incorrect tense usage ('when they studies'), and fragmented sentence structures. There is a lack of error-free sentences, and the high frequency of grammatical inaccuracies frequently causes difficulty for the reader. These features reflect the Band 4 descriptor profile.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.