Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-07-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Overall, it is clear that table tennis followed an upward trend, while amateur dramatics followed downward trend over the given period of time.

To commence with, nearly 70% people had interest in film club in 2000, which decreased to approximately 60% after 1 decade. Moreover at the end of period it was its peak point, at nearly 70%. Additionally, in 2000 people who involved in table tennis was below 20, which rose dramatically to above 50% at the end of the period. In addition, martial arts participants showed fluctuations over the given period if time.

Moving ahead, nearly 30% people involved in amateur dramatics, which firstly increased then decreased to nearly zero% in 2020. In contrast, in 2005 around zero% of people participated in musical performances, which rose to 20% in 2020.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response covers all key features of the graph, including the main trends and some specific data points. However, the analysis is somewhat mechanical and lacks a deeper synthesis of the data. For instance, the description of the film club is slightly confusing, as it mentions a decrease after a decade and then a peak at the end, which could be explained more clearly. While the main features are identified, the comparison between categories could be more sophisticated to reach a higher band. The overview is present but could be more comprehensive by highlighting the most significant contrast between the activities.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized into paragraphs, and the progression of ideas is generally clear. Cohesive devices such as 'To commence with', 'Moreover', and 'In contrast' are used to link sentences and paragraphs. However, some of the transitions feel a bit mechanical or repetitive. The referencing is generally clear, but there are instances where the flow could be improved by using more varied linking phrases rather than relying on simple sequence markers. Overall, the structure is coherent and serves the purpose of the task well.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to describe trends and figures. There are some attempts at less common vocabulary, such as 'fluctuations' and 'dramatically'. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and phrasing, such as 'people who involved in' instead of 'people involved in' or 'people who were involved in'. Additionally, the use of 'zero%' is slightly awkward. To improve, the writer should focus on more precise collocations and ensure that terminology related to data description is used accurately throughout the response.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are several grammatical errors, such as 'nearly 70% people' (should be '70% of people'), 'after 1 decade' (should be 'a decade'), and 'if time' (a typo for 'of time'). There are also issues with subject-verb agreement and preposition usage, such as 'people who involved in'. These errors occur frequently but do not significantly impede communication. To reach a higher band, the writer needs to demonstrate more consistent control over complex structures and reduce the frequency of basic grammatical slips.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.