Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-07-29
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The line chart illustrates data regarding the number of candidates doing different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia from 2000 to 2020.
Overall, it is apparent that film club had the highest number of participants and musical performances was surged gradually in the number of people. Furthermore, while table tennis saw a progressive increase, material arts was fluctuating over the period shown.
In detail, film club was started with around 65 people in 2000 and grown by 68 till 2020 and martial arts was stabilized and had approximately 45 participants during the period. Moreover, amateur dramatics exhibited more downward trajectory, starting with 25 and 5 in the end.
For table tennis, the number of people reported increasing over the period from 25 to around 50 and musical performances started in 2005 and performed by 10 participants in 2010 and increased to 15 in 2020.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response covers the main features of the graph, including trends and comparisons. However, it falls slightly short of the 150-word minimum requirement, which impacts the overall task completion. While the overview is present, some data points are described with limited precision, such as the vague 'grown by 68' which does not accurately reflect the graph's scale. The inclusion of all categories is good, but the analysis of the data could be more detailed to fully satisfy the requirements of the task. The failure to meet the minimum word count is a significant factor in this score.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the information. The use of cohesive devices like 'Overall', 'Furthermore', and 'In detail' is present, though some transitions feel slightly mechanical. The progression of ideas is generally clear, moving from an overview to specific category details. However, the connection between sentences could be smoother to improve the flow of the report. The paragraphing is appropriate for an academic task, but the overall structure could benefit from more sophisticated linking words to connect the data points more effectively.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the student to describe trends such as 'progressive increase' and 'downward trajectory'. However, there are instances of awkward phrasing and word choice errors, such as 'musical performances was surged' (should be 'surged') and 'material arts' (likely meant 'martial arts'). The range of vocabulary is somewhat limited, relying on basic descriptors. To reach a higher band, the student should incorporate more precise collocations and avoid repetitive structures when describing changes in data.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. For example, 'film club was started' is passive voice used incorrectly, and 'musical performances was surged' contains a subject-verb agreement error. There are also issues with tense consistency and preposition usage, such as 'grown by 68 till 2020'. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors prevents the response from reaching a higher band. More attention to verb forms and sentence construction is needed.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
