Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-07-31

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The line chart describes the data about the numbers of contestants for different performances at a specific social centre in the city of Australia called Melbourne between the years 2000 to 2020.

The highest number of participants from the former years to the last year of the graph i.e, from 2000 to 2020 is in the activity known as film club, there was a significant little downfall in the year 2010 but it gradually grown in later years.Whereas, there were no contestants in the venture of Musical performance in 2000 but in later years individuals started participating and reached to approx 18% of ratio.Additionally, amateur dramatics was at the average ratio in the starting years but it fell to its minimum point to approx 5% in the year 2020.

Moreover, participates from the field material arts were also at standard norm over two decades,And lastly the game called table tennis was at an average point in starting but in the later years it typically grown to approx 55%,which is the second highest activity played by the contestants in the year 2020.

Overall, the highest participated venture is Film club, the second highest is Table tennis and the least one is Amateur dramatics in the last year of the graph mentioned.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response covers all the activities presented in the graph and provides a clear overview of the main trends. However, the analysis is somewhat superficial. For instance, the student describes the trends using vague terms like 'average ratio' or 'standard norm' rather than accurately interpreting the numerical data provided. While the main features are identified, the comparison between activities is limited, and the use of 'ratio' to describe raw numbers is technically inaccurate. To reach a higher band, the student should focus on precise data reporting and ensure that the terminology used to describe the graph is accurate and professional.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a summary. Cohesive devices such as 'Whereas', 'Additionally', and 'Moreover' are used to connect ideas, although some transitions feel slightly mechanical. The progression of information is generally clear, but the internal structure of the body paragraphs could be improved by grouping related trends more effectively. The referencing is mostly clear, though the flow between sentences is occasionally interrupted by awkward phrasing. Overall, the response is coherent and easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks precision. The student uses terms like 'venture', 'contestants', and 'field material arts' in ways that are not entirely natural in the context of describing a social centre's activities. There are also some inaccuracies in word choice, such as using 'ratio' when referring to participant numbers. While the student attempts to use a range of vocabulary, the lack of collocation and occasional misuse of terms limits the score. More precise terminology related to data description would improve the quality of the writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, such as 'it gradually grown' (should be 'it gradually grew'), 'participates from the field' (should be 'participants'), and punctuation issues like missing spaces after commas. The subject-verb agreement and tense usage are inconsistent throughout the text. Despite these errors, the reader can understand the intended message without significant difficulty. To improve, the student should focus on verb forms and proofreading for basic punctuation and agreement errors.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.