Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The provided line chart elucidates the data regarding the count of individuals indulged in distinct pursuits at a specific social centre in an Australian city called, Melbourne.

overall, it is evident that the highest count of participants were engaged in film club at the social centre throughout the time period, whereas the category of amateur dramatics ended up with least attendees in the last year.

After thoroughly analysing the data demonstrated in the line graph, film club of the given Australian social centre seems to be quite notorious as its members' count remained sky high in the 20 years of time period after initiating from 65 in the year 2000 and appearing almost intact in the last year after a few minor fluctuations. Identically, the figures for martial artists were near about same in initial and latter year with numerous ups and downs between these years, while starting and ending at 37

Turning to the rest of the description, the total of amateur dramatics' contestants were 26 in 2000 before hitting its highest point of 29 in the year 2005 and depleted vigorously till 2020, ending up with just 9 contributing individuals. In terms of table tennis, 16 players were indulged in the game which emerged as 20 in 2005 and stood the same till 2010 and surged towards the peak till 2020 and arrived at a sum of 52 players. Lastly, musical performances were least popular among the contestants as there were almost no participants in it till 2005 which ended up with 19 after following a constant rise.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

You have successfully identified the main trends and provided a clear overview of the data. You covered all categories and made relevant comparisons, such as noting the contrast between the popularity of the film club and the decline in amateur dramatics. However, the report could be improved by ensuring the data points are more precise. For example, describing the film club as 'notorious' is an inappropriate word choice, as it implies a negative reputation rather than high popularity. Additionally, ensure that all figures are accurately reported; while you captured the general movements, the analysis would benefit from a more balanced focus on the most significant changes rather than listing every minor fluctuation.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is logically organized with a clear introduction, overview, and body paragraphs. You use a range of cohesive devices such as 'Turning to', 'Identically', and 'Lastly' to guide the reader through the data. Paragraphing is used effectively to separate different categories of activities. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical, and the flow between sentences could be smoother. For instance, the transition between the overview and the first body paragraph could be more integrated. Overall, the information is presented in a coherent manner that is easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary, including terms like 'elucidates', 'fluctuations', and 'depleted'. However, there are some significant issues with word choice and collocation. Using 'notorious' to describe a popular club is incorrect, as it carries a negative connotation. Similarly, 'indulged in' is not the most natural collocation for participating in activities. Phrases like 'sky high' are too informal for an Academic Task 1 report. To reach a higher band, focus on using more precise, academic vocabulary and ensuring that words are used in their correct context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, which is appropriate for this task. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'the highest count of participants were' (should be 'was'), 'near about same' (should be 'about the same'), and 'stood the same' (should be 'remained the same'). Additionally, there are minor punctuation and article errors throughout the text. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and more precise prepositional usage will help improve your accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.