Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-22
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The information about the number of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 is demonstrated by poly line graph.
Overall, it is crystal clear that, the highest count of participants about film club in 2020. However, the least was regarding musical performance in 2005.
To begin with, the highest number of participants in film club in 2020 was 67. Whereas, 1 count of participants in musical performance in 2005, which could be considered as the lowest figure. In addition the similar number of participants in table tennis and amateur dramatics in 2010 was 20. Surprisingly, 65 count of participants in film club arts in 2015, which was 5 number more than the film club in 2010.
Moving towards the rest of the information, the count of participants in table tennis in 2000 was 15. Furthermore, the number of participants in martial arts during the given period of time ram=nged between 32 and 38. Eventually, the number of participants in amateur arts, table tennis and musical performance in 2015 was 5, 7 and 55, respectively.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response covers the main features of the graph, but the presentation of data is often disjointed and lacks a clear analytical focus. While you identify the highest and lowest points, the selection of data is somewhat erratic, jumping between years and activities without a logical narrative flow. The overview is present but lacks sufficient synthesis of trends, focusing instead on isolated data points. To improve, ensure you group information by trends (e.g., activities that increased versus those that fluctuated) rather than listing individual figures, which makes the report feel like a collection of data points rather than a summary.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organised into paragraphs, but the logical progression is weak. The use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'Moving towards the rest of the information' or 'Eventually', which do not fit the context of describing a graph. Referencing is sometimes unclear, and the transition between sentences is abrupt. The structure would benefit from a more consistent approach to comparing data, using linking words that show contrast or similarity more naturally, such as 'in contrast', 'similarly', or 'by comparison', rather than relying on repetitive sentence structures.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There is a heavy reliance on the word 'count' and 'number of participants', which becomes repetitive. Some phrasing is unnatural, such as 'film club arts' or 'poly line graph'. You attempt to use some specific terminology, but the lack of variety in reporting verbs and nouns limits the score. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider range of synonyms for 'increase', 'decrease', and 'fluctuate', and ensure collocations are accurate.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The response contains a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures, but there are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation that occasionally hinder readability. For example, 'the highest count of participants about film club in 2020' is grammatically incomplete, and '65 count of participants' is awkward phrasing. There are also issues with subject-verb agreement and missing articles. While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the response from reaching a higher band. Focus on proofreading for basic sentence construction and ensuring that every sentence has a clear subject and verb.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.