Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-28
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The given graph illustrates data from a social centre in Melbourne, Australia and depicts the proportion of participants participating in different activities namely: Film club, Martial arts, Amateur dramatics, Table tennis and Musical performances from 2000 to 2020 respectively.
Overall, Most amount of participation is seen in the film club and remained significantly high throughout the span of 20 years. Amateur dramatic category kept declining after 2005 and by 2020 it had least amount of participation.
In terms of totality, Film club activity had the highest amount of participation around 65 members. Martial arts category also maintained a stable graph and only increased in 2010 by 40 members which initially started with around 38 members participating. Table tennis started with very low amount of people participating around 15 people but experianced a spike after 2010 and by 2020 it had more than 55 members.
Another category where growth was recorded is musical performance in 2000 there were almost no participants but it gradually increased to
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response identifies the main trends and provides some data points, but it is incomplete. The final sentence is cut off mid-thought, which prevents a full summary of the data. While the overview captures the general movement of the film club and amateur dramatics, the reporting of specific figures is sometimes imprecise (e.g., 'around 65 members' is vague). To reach a higher band, you must ensure all categories are fully described and that the report is completed in full, avoiding abrupt endings that leave the reader without the final data points.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the progression of ideas is hindered by the incomplete final sentence. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Overall' and 'In terms of', but the transitions between sentences can feel a bit mechanical. The referencing is generally clear, but the lack of a concluding summary or a fully developed final paragraph affects the overall flow and coherence of the response.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'proportion', 'significantly high', and 'gradually increased'. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'Most amount of participation' (should be 'The highest level of participation') and 'experianced' (spelling error). The vocabulary is sufficient to convey the main points, but it lacks the precision and variety required for a higher band score. Focusing on more academic collocations would improve your score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'Amateur dramatic category kept declining' (missing article) and 'In terms of totality' (unnatural phrasing). Punctuation is generally acceptable, but the incomplete sentence at the end is a significant issue. While the errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to suggest a lack of control over more complex structures. You should focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of articles.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
