Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The graph illustrates the information about the number of participants for five different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia from 2000 to 2020.

It can be clearly seen that the number of participants in martial arts was 35 in 2000 and a fluctuating trend was experienced throughout the period. The number of participants in amateur dramatics was 25 in 2000. In 2005, a slight increase in participants were observed and reached approximately 30. Thereafter, there was a steady decline in the number of participants till the year 2020.

Moving further, the musical performances were started in 2005 and the activity experienced a steady growth in the subsequent years and reached approximately 20 participants in 2020. In 2000, the number of participants in table tennis was 15. In the next 2 years, the participants remained the same 20. After that, there was a significant growth in the number of participants and reached 55 in the year 2020. The participants in film club activity remained the same 65 throughout the period except in 2010 where the number of participants witnessed a slight decrease.

Overall, the martial arts activity witnessed a fluctuating trend whereas the film club remained the same. The amateur dramatics experienced a declining trend while the musical performances showed a gradual growth. The participants in table tennis activity witnessed a substantial growth.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response covers all key features of the graph, including the trends for all five activities. You have successfully identified the main features and made relevant comparisons, such as noting the stability of the film club versus the growth in table tennis. However, the report is somewhat descriptive, listing data points for each category sequentially rather than grouping them more analytically to highlight significant trends or relationships. To reach a higher band, ensure that the overview clearly synthesises the most striking differences or patterns rather than just summarizing each line individually.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a summary overview. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the different activities. Cohesive devices such as 'thereafter', 'moving further', and 'overall' are used to guide the reader. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical, and the flow between sentences could be smoother. For example, the transition between the description of amateur dramatics and musical performances is a bit abrupt. Improving the variety of linking phrases would enhance the overall cohesion.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey information clearly. Phrases like 'fluctuating trend', 'steady growth', and 'substantial growth' are used effectively. There are some minor inaccuracies, such as 'the musical performances were started', which is slightly unnatural; 'musical performances began' would be better. You also repeat 'number of participants' frequently, which limits the lexical variety. Using synonyms like 'attendance figures', 'the count', or 'the number of people involved' would improve the sophistication of your writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While most sentences are clear, there are some grammatical errors, such as 'a slight increase in participants were observed' (should be 'was observed') and 'the participants remained the same 20' (should be 'remained at 20'). Additionally, 'the musical performances were started' is a passive construction that is not necessary here. Despite these errors, the meaning is always clear, and the punctuation is generally accurate. Increasing the use of more complex, error-free structures would help raise your score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.