Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 7.5)

The line chart illustrates the number of participants in various activities at a social center in Melbourne, Australia, over the years 2000 to 2020.

Overall, the data reveals that participation in all activities generally increased, except for martial arts and amateur drama. The film club consistently had the most participants, while table tennis showed the greatest growth.

In 2000, the film club had 64 participants, which slightly decreased to 60 in 2010 before rebounding to 65 by the end of the period. Martial arts participation remained relatively steady, starting at 38 participants, peaking at 39 in 2010, and concluding at 37.

The other activities began with lower participation numbers: 27 for amateur drama, 18 for table tennis, and 0 for musical performances, as they were not available initially. Over the next decade, amateur drama saw a decline, dropping to just 5 participants by 2020. Conversely, table tennis experienced substantial growth, reaching 52 participants by the end of the period. Musical performances, introduced in 2005, saw a steady increase in participants, leveling off just under 20 by 2020.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.5
Coherence and Cohesion7.5
Lexical Resource7.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy7.5
Overall7.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The student covers all parts of the task well, providing an accurate overview of the main trends and making clear comparisons where relevant. Key features, such as the film club consistently having the highest numbers and the significant growth in table tennis, are highlighted effectively with specific data points cited (e.g., '64 participants', 'reaching 52 participants by the end of the period'). The overview paragraph successfully captures the general trends without unnecessary clutter. The response fulfills the requirements of Task 1 comprehensively and accurately.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

Ideas are logically sequenced and the report progresses clearly from an introductory summary to detailed body paragraphs. Paragraphing is used appropriately, with each body paragraph focusing on specific activities and trends. Cohesive devices are used naturally and effectively, such as 'Overall', 'Conversely', and 'In 2000'. Referencing is clear throughout, contributing to a seamless reading experience where information flows logically from one point to the next.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.0

The student demonstrates a sufficient and flexible range of vocabulary suited to describing graphical data. Phrases such as 'consistently had the most participants', 'rebounding to 65', and 'experienced substantial growth' show a good command of collocation and style. Less common items are used naturally without forcing, and there are no noticeable spelling or word-choice errors that impede communication. The lexical resource is well-suited for a high band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5

The response features a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures, showing good control of grammar and punctuation. Examples such as 'The line chart illustrates the number of participants... over the years 2000 to 2020' and 'Musical performances, introduced in 2005, saw a steady increase...' demonstrate accurate use of subordinate clauses and participial phrases. The majority of sentences are error-free, and any complex structures attempted are handled securely, resulting in clear and precise communication.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.