Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The graph illustrates the number of people who participated in five different kinds of activities at a social centre in Melbourne, Australia between 2000 and 2020.

Overall, participants in the film club remained relatively stable throughout the period but the number of people participated in Martial arts fluctuated. The figure for amateur dramatics declined while the number of members in Table Tennis and Musical Performances increased considerably.

In 2000, the film club was by far the most famous activity, with approximately 64 participants. Although its membership fluctuated slightly over the following two decades, it remained relatively stable, ending at around 60 participants in 2020. Martial art, on the other hand, began with almost 38 participants and fluctuated considerably throughout the period, reaching roughly 40 in 2020.

The number of people involved in amateur was around 25 in 2000 and almost stayed same till 2005 but fell dramatically to 10 in 2020. Similarly participation in Table tennis rose dramatically from approximately 28 to about 55 over the same period. Furthermore, musical Performances showed a different pattern. There were no participants in this activity from 2000 to 2005. Its popularity increased rapidly started rising from 0 in 2005 and in 2020, there was around 20 participants in this activity.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The student addresses all parts of the task by reporting the main features, trends, and comparisons across the five activities shown in the graph. An adequate overview is provided in the second paragraph, highlighting key trends such as the stability of the film club and the substantial growth in table tennis and musical performances. Key data points are generally accurate, such as noting that the film club started at approximately 64 participants and remained relatively stable. However, there are some minor data inaccuracies in the body paragraphs: for instance, the text states that martial arts reached roughly 40 in 2020 (the actual value is around 36) and misquotes the starting point for table tennis as 28 (it was around 16). Despite these minor misreadings, the response successfully covers all data series and presents a clear overview, fulfilling the requirements for Band 6.5, rounded to Band 7.0 for addressing all parts with clear trends.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is logically organized with a clear overall progression from introduction to overview, followed by detailed body paragraphs. Each paragraph has a clear central topic, such as grouping the film club and martial arts together, and amateur dramatics alongside table tennis and musical performances. Cohesive devices are used adequately to signal transitions and comparisons, such as 'Overall', 'In 2000', 'on the other hand', and 'Similarly'. Paragraphing is handled appropriately, ensuring the structure is easy to follow. Referencing is generally clear, though occasional mechanical transitions keep the text from achieving a higher band. Overall, the logical flow and standard paragraph structure fully support a Band 7.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow for flexibility and precision, employing terms such as 'participated', 'fluctuated', 'declined', and 'considerably'. There is an attempt to use less common vocabulary and phraseology, such as 'by far the most famous activity' (though 'popular' would be more collocationally appropriate than 'famous'). Some minor lexical errors occur, such as the incomplete phrase 'involved in amateur' (missing 'dramatics') and 'Martial art' instead of the plural 'Martial arts'. However, the vocabulary is adequate to convey the intended meaning effectively, and spelling is generally accurate. This performance aligns well with the Band 6.5 criteria, warranting a 6.5 score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including subordinate clauses introduced by 'while', 'although', and 'where'. There are several grammatically correct and fluent sentences, demonstrating good control of past tense forms for historical data. However, a few noticeable errors occur throughout the text, such as 'the number of people participated' (should be 'participating' or 'who participated') and 'almost stayed same' (missing 'the'). Additionally, there is a minor subject-verb agreement slip with 'musical Performances showed' and a missing noun in 'involved in amateur'. These errors do not impede communication, placing the response firmly in the Band 6.5 category.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.