Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line graph illustrates the data of individuals taking part in different activities to a social centre in Melbourne and Australia between 2000 and 2020.

Overall, the film club remained the most favorite activity among the people throghout the period, while musical instruments showed a less intersetd activity.

In 2010, 15 people participate in table tenis but after 2010, there can be seen a huge rise in participations which is around 55 of the individuals.While amateur dramatics shows a steady rise at around 25, after this there is a dramatic fall around 5 people in 2020. In contrast the biggest decline in musical performances can be seen at first, but after that there is a steady rise around 15 people in 2020.In martial art some fluctuations held during two decades, it gradually fell in 2020. In 2000, film club remained most popular among the people around 62 persons take part in it, there is a tiny rise after 10 years.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The student covers most parts of the task by reporting on several activities and making some comparisons. An overview is attempted, noting that the film club was the most popular activity and musical performances saw lower interest. However, the overview is slightly inaccurate regarding musical performances, as they started at zero and rose rather than simply remaining a low-interest activity throughout. Furthermore, some data points are misreported or vague (e.g., stating '15 people participate in table tennis' in 2010 when the chart shows 20, and referring to 'musical instruments' instead of 'musical performances'). The details lack full precision, which limits the score to a solid Band 5.5.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response has an overall structure with an introduction, overview, and body sentences, but paragraphing is extremely poor, clumped together into an unstructured block of text. Cohesive devices are used mechanically or inaccurately (e.g., 'after this', 'In contrast', 'In martial art some fluctuations held'), leading to a somewhat disjointed progression of ideas. While the overall topic can be followed, the lack of distinct paragraphs and awkward transitions prevent the response from achieving a higher score.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The student attempts a range of vocabulary relevant to the visual data, using words such as 'fluctuations', 'dramatic fall', and 'steady rise'. However, there are noticeable lexical errors, such as using 'favorite' instead of 'popular', 'intersetd' (interested) instead of 'interesting', and referring to 'musical instruments' instead of 'musical performances'. Spelling errors ('throghout', 'participations', 'tenis', 'held') and awkward phrasing ('less intersetd activity') restrict the lexical range and cause some difficulty for the reader.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but control is inconsistent. There are frequent grammatical errors and awkward phrasing, such as 'illustrates the data of individuals taking part... to a social centre', 'there can be seen a huge rise', and 'some fluctuations held during two decades'. Punctuation and preposition use are also frequently flawed (e.g., missing articles, incorrect prepositions). These frequent errors cause occasional strain for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.