Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The provided line graph delineates the trajectory of participants for different activities at one social center in Melbourne, Aistralia over a year period spanning from 2000 to 2020.Alternatively, the data is calibrated in numbers.

Overall, it is manifest that film club experienced a prominant upward trend, whereas amateur dramatics witnessed a notable decline over the time frame. Notably, despite some intermediate fluctuations, tabel tennis or amateur dramatics remained the dominanat metric throughout the entire duration. The gap between the highest and lowest variables widened significantly by the end of the period.

In regard to the initial data point , In 2000, the figurefor film club stood at 65 participants, which was substantially higher than that of amateue dramatics at merly 5 participants. over the subsequent 2000 year, the table tennisclimbed steadlyto reach a pinnacle of 55 participants in 2020.conversely, table tennis gradually bottoming out at 15 participants midway through the timeline before experiencing a marginal recovery.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The student attempts to address the prompt by describing trends for different activities in the provided line graph. However, there are significant factual inaccuracies in the data reported, such as claiming amateur dramatics stood at 'merly 5 participants' in 2000 (when it was around 26) and confusing table tennis with film club trends. The overview identifies some broad patterns, but the misinterpretation of data and flawed comparative features limit the development. It meets the minimum word count requirement, but due to inaccuracies in data reporting, it corresponds to Band 5.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response is organized into paragraphs, including an introduction, an overview, and a body paragraph. However, logical progression is hindered by confusing contradictions, such as stating that table tennis or amateur dramatics remained the 'dominanat metric' and mixing up entity names. Cohesive devices are attempted (e.g., 'Overall', 'conversely'), but referencing is sometimes unclear, and mechanical errors in paragraph linking weaken the overall flow. Paragraphing is present, but overall cohesion is inadequate at times. This reflects a Band 5.0 level.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used demonstrates a limited range with several noticeable spelling and word choice errors (e.g., 'Aistralia', 'prominant', 'tabel tennis', 'dominanat'). While the student attempts less common lexical items ('trajectory', 'delineates', 'pinnacle'), these are often accompanied by inaccuracies or typos that occasionally cause confusion for the reader. The control over word formation and spelling is weak in places, placing this response at Band 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The student uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but grammatical accuracy is quite low due to frequent errors. Examples include missing articles, punctuation slips ('initial data point , In 2000'), and faulty phrasing ('over the subsequent 2000 year, the table tennisclimbed steadlyto reach...'). Word spacing errors ('steadlyto') and tense or subject confusion are common and frequently disrupt readability. This performance aligns with a Band 5.0 descriptor.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.