Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The line graph illustrates changes in the number of participants across different activities at a social centre in Melbourne, Australia, including the film club, martial arts, amateur dramatics, table tennis, and musical performances, over the period from 2000 to 2020.

Overall, it is evident that the figures followed varying trends over the given period, with some activities increasing, while others declined or remained stable. The film club recorded the highest figure, whereas amateur dramatics had the lowest figure. However, amateur dramatics fell dramatically, while table tennis increased significantly over the period.

Looking at the details, the number of participants in the film club remained relatively stable at the beginning and end of the period. Moreover, amateur dramatics stood at approximately 28 participants in 2000 and then fell dramatically to roughly 9 participants in 2020. Furthermore, musical performances started at 1 participants in 2005 and increased continuously to approximately 19 participants by the end of the period.

The number of participants in martial arts remained relatively stable at the beginning and end of the period. Moreover, table tennis stood at roughly 18 participants in 2000 and increased continuously to approximately 21 participants in 2010 and then rose sharply to nearly 55 participants in 2020.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The student successfully covers all parts of the task by reporting the main features of the line graph and making relevant comparisons. An appropriate overview is provided, highlighting the varying trends and extremes (such as the film club having the highest figures and amateur dramatics declining significantly). Key data points are generally reported accurately, such as table tennis rising sharply to nearly 55 participants in 2020. However, there are a few minor inaccuracies in numerical reporting, such as stating musical performances started at "1 participants in 2005" when the graph shows zero in 2000 and 2005 before starting at 12 in 2010. Overall, the response is well-developed and meets all core requirements for this task.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The response is logically organised with a clear overall progression. It begins with a suitable introduction, followed by an overview paragraph, and then detailed body paragraphs that group information logically by activity. Cohesive devices such as "Overall", "whereas", "Moreover", and "Furthermore" are used effectively to guide the reader through the data, although some transitional phrases are slightly mechanical. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, overview, and body details, ensuring clear logical organisation throughout.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary for the task, successfully employing less common items such as "fluctuated", "remained relatively stable", "fell dramatically", and "increased continuously". Word choice is generally appropriate, though there are minor inaccuracies in preposition use or exact phrasing (e.g., "at 1 participants" instead of "1 participant"). Spelling and word formation are generally accurate, allowing the message to be communicated clearly and without impediment.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The response exhibits a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including relative clauses ("activities... including the film club...") and subordinate clauses. There is a frequent presence of error-free sentences, demonstrating good control of grammar and punctuation. Minor errors do occur, such as the singular/plural mismatch in "at 1 participants", but these errors are infrequent and do not impede communication, placing the response solidly in the Band 7 category.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.