Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-21
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The line graph illustrates the numbers of participants involved in different activities on social centre in Melbourne, Australia from 2000 to 2020.
Overall, film club had the highest number of participants as compare to others. regarding table tennis was secound highest figure of participants
film club had 65 number of participants from 2000 and it fluctuated between 60 to 65 straight to 2020. However, table tennis participants started from 18 in 2000 . In 2010 participants of table tennis rose steadily to 2020.
Martial arts accounted 35 number of participants in 2000. afterthat, it fluctuated 30 to 35 participants from 2000 to 2020. Amateur dramatics had 25 participants in 2000, after 10 years participants steadily decreased to 2020. Musical perfomances the most lowest participants get participate in this . participants strated participate from 0 in 2005 and increased to 15 participants.
Overview, the film club had the highest participants as regarding to others, Moreover table tennis was similiar to that but not much that same. The most participants got participation in musical perfomance around 15.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response attempts to cover the main features of the graph, identifying the film club as having the highest participation and noting trends for other activities such as table tennis and amateur dramatics. However, the data points reported contain several inaccuracies when compared to the visual data. For example, the student states that the film club had '65 number of participants from 2000' (the actual value is around 64) and that musical performances started at 0 in 2005 (they actually started around 2010). Furthermore, the overview is repetitive and lacks a clear, cohesive summary of the overall trends. The ideas are underdeveloped and the lack of precision in reporting data places this performance within band 5.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The text is organized into paragraphs, attempting an introduction, body paragraphs, and an overview/conclusion. However, the logical progression is weak and repetitive, as seen in the redundant overviews provided at the beginning and the end. Cohesive devices are used very mechanically or incorrectly (e.g., 'regarding table tennis was secound highest figure', 'afterthat', 'after 10 years'). Paragraphing is attempted, but the grouping of information lacks internal cohesion and clear progression. Referencing and linking between ideas are frequently faulty, leading to a disjointed reading experience. These features align with band 5.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is very basic and repetitive (e.g., 'participants', 'number of participants', 'activities'). There are several non-standard collocations and word choices, such as 'most lowest participants get participate in this' and 'strated participate'. While the student attempts to use some topic-related vocabulary like 'fluctuated', 'decreased', and 'increased', the range is limited and inadequate for a higher band. Spelling and word-formation errors occur frequently (e.g., 'secound', 'afterthat', 'perfomances', 'strated'), which causes some difficulty for the reader and restricts the score to a band 5.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response demonstrates a very limited range of grammatical structures. Simple sentences dominate, and attempts at more complex or varied constructions often result in significant grammatical errors (e.g., 'film club had 65 number of participants from 2000 and it fluctuated between 60 to 65 straight to 2020'). There are frequent errors in verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions (e.g., 'on social centre', 'accounted 35 number of participants'). Punctuation is also erratic, with missing capitalisation at the start of sentences and misplaced commas. These persistent errors frequently impede smooth reading, justifying a band 5.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.