Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given graph illustrates the number of participants for different kind of activities at one social centre in Australia city Melbourne for the period 2000 to 2020.

Overall it can be seen that film club activity dominated the graph.Whereas, Amateur dramatic activity recorded declined over the period. Other activities such as Musical performance, Martial art and Table tennis also reported significant changes throuout the period.

To begin with, martial art approximately 35 participants were participated in 2000 and figure fluctuated till 2020. In addition, around 65 people were involved in film club activity in 2000 before decreased to 60 in 2010 and increased again to 65 in 2020. However, amateur dramatic activity recorded roughly 26 participants in 2000 before slighly increased to 27 in 2005 while, this figure dramatically fell down to approximately 5 participants in 2020.

turning to the remaining activities, nearly 20 participants were intrusted in tennis ball from 2000 to 2010, however, this figure increased significantly over the period to approximately 52 participants in 2020. Whereas, no person involed in musical performance activity from 2000 to 2005 before around 18 participants in 2020. The number of participants for amateur dramatic and table tennis were recorded same in 2010.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The student attempts to cover all major features of the line graph, including the dominant film club, the declining amateur dramatics, and the rising table tennis and musical performances. An overview is provided in the second paragraph, capturing the main trends. However, there are some inaccuracies and omissions in data reporting; for instance, the description of martial arts states "approximately 35 participants were participated in 2000" which contains grammatical awkwardness, and the mention of tennis ball instead of table tennis shows a slight misreading of the activity name. Additionally, some data points lack precise comparative depth. Nevertheless, the main trends are adequately identified, satisfying the criteria for Band 6.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response is organized into logical paragraphs, starting with an introduction and overview, followed by body paragraphs grouping the activities. Cohesive devices are used to guide the reader, such as "To begin with", "In addition", "However", and "turning to the remaining activities". However, referencing and cohesion are sometimes faulty or mechanical, as seen in punctuation errors around transitions ("Overall it can be seen" missing a comma) and awkward linking phrases like "while, this figure dramatically fell down". Paragraphing is present and generally appropriate, but the overall flow can feel slightly disjointed due to structural slips. This places the response firmly in the Band 6 descriptor category.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as "dominated", "fluctuated", and "dramatically fell down". However, there are noticeable lexical errors and inaccurate word choices throughout the text, such as referring to "different kind of activities", using "tennis ball" instead of table tennis, and writing "intrusted" instead of interested. Spelling and word choice errors do not severely impede communication, but they restrict the lexical score to Band 5.5 or 6.0. Given the frequency of vocabulary slips, Band 6 is appropriate for an adequate attempt that covers basic requirements.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting structures like relative clauses and time-bound adverbials ("for the period 2000 to 2020"). However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly regarding voice and verb forms, such as "were participated", "before decreased", and "no person involed in". Punctuation is also weak in places, such as missing commas after introductory phrases and incorrect use of commas before conjunctions like "while, this figure". These errors occasionally cause minor difficulty for the reader, but simple sentences are generally understandable, supporting a Band 5.5 or 6.0 score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.