Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-24
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The line graphs illustrate that the numbers of participants for different activities in a particular country Australia between 2000 and 2020.
Overall, the trend shows that film is the accounted largest proportion of perticipants from 2000 to 2020. In addition, table tennis and musical performances ended with a up ward trend . Martial arts was flactuating all over the period . However, amateur deamatics was gradually fall.
In 2000 , film club was the largest participans around 65 and slightly fell at 60 in 2010, later climbed up at approximately 65 in 2020. Table tennis started with 15 in 2000 and a minimally rise at 18 in 2010 before grew up at around 52 in 2020. Musical performances started from 2005 and gradually increased at 18 in 2020.
In contrast, Martial arts showed the flactuating from 35 to 36 time period between 2000 and 2020. While amateur deamatics slowly grew up around 28 in 2005 before dramatically down ward at 5 in 2020.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The student covers all parts of the task by reporting the main features, trends, and comparisons of the five activities shown in the line graph. An overview is present, identifying film club as the most popular activity and noting general upward or downward trajectories for others, such as table tennis and amateur dramatics. Key data points are correctly referenced, such as the film club starting at around 65 and ending around 66, and table tennis growing significantly from 15 to around 52. However, there are minor inaccuracies in some descriptions, such as stating that musical performances started from 2005 when the graph shows zero participants until 2010. Overall, the response fulfills the requirements of Task 1 adequately, though the overview could be slightly more polished.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response is organized into four distinct paragraphs, presenting a logical structure with an introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs detailing specific data. Cohesive devices are used to connect ideas, such as 'Overall', 'In addition', and 'In contrast'. However, referencing and cohesion are sometimes faulty or mechanical. For instance, the transition between sentences can feel abrupt, and pronouns or linking expressions are not always used with complete precision. Paragraphing is present and appropriate, but the overall progression of ideas could be smoother to achieve a higher band.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'proportion', 'upward trend', and 'fluctuating'. However, there are several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including 'perticipants' instead of participants, 'deamatics' instead of dramatics, 'flactuating' instead of fluctuating, and 'dramatically down ward' instead of a dramatic downward trend. These errors detract from the overall lexical quality, though communication is not severely impeded.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as using subordinate clauses introduced by 'while'. However, grammatical accuracy is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in verb forms, prepositions, and sentence construction, such as 'film is the accounted largest proportion', 'amateur deamatics was gradually fall', and 'before grew up at around 52'. Punctuation also exhibits minor issues, such as unnecessary spaces before commas. These errors require some effort from the reader to parse, placing this response firmly in the Band 5.5 range.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.