Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The given multi-line graph tracks the number of participants who took park in five different activities at social centre in Melbourne, Australia for a total period of twenty years from 2000 to 2020.

Overall, the film club retained it position as the most participated activity throughout these years. A rise could be seen in number of participants taking part in table tennis and musical performances. Additionally, number of participants taking part in martial arts remained steady. However, a decline was seen in number of participants of the amateur dramatics.

Film club remained the most dominant activity for the twenty-year period. It experienced a slight fall in 2010 and a steady rise till 2020 which brought its number to approximately 67 participants. Martial arts remained steady despite some minor fluctuations. The most drastic rise was seen at number of participants of table tennis after the year 2010, at around 19 participants, to around 55 participants in 2020.

There were no participants for musical performances till 2005 after which a steady rise was seen till 2020, at around 19 participants. Ultimately, the amateur dramatics was the only activity that declined. After reaching a peak at 2005, at 29 participants, a gradual decline was seen till 2020 bringing number of participants down to 8.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.5
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The student successfully addresses all parts of the task by reporting the main features, trends, and notable comparisons across the five activities over the twenty-year period. An overview is clearly provided in the second paragraph, highlighting key trends such as the dominance of the film club and the contrasting trajectories of table tennis and amateur dramatics. Key data points are accurately cited and supported from the graph, such as table tennis rising from around 19 to 55 participants, and amateur dramatics peaking in 2005 before declining. The response is fully developed and well-focused on the prompt requirements without major omissions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay is logically organised, with a clear introduction, an overview paragraph, and body paragraphs that group information logically by activity and trend. Cohesive devices such as 'Overall', 'Additionally', 'However', and 'Ultimately' are used appropriately to guide the reader through the data. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and effectively, ensuring a clear progression of ideas throughout the response. Referencing is generally clear, though minor improvements in transitional phrasing could make the flow even more seamless.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary to describe trends and data accurately, using terms such as 'dominant', 'drastic rise', 'fluctuations', and 'gradual decline'. There are occasional awkward lexical choices or minor inaccuracies, such as 'took park' instead of 'took part', 'most participated activity' instead of 'most popular activity', and omitting articles in phrases like 'at social centre'. However, the vocabulary is adequate to convey meaning with some precision and flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

A mix of simple and complex sentence structures is used throughout the essay. The writer successfully employs subordinate clauses and prepositional phrases, such as 'After reaching a peak at 2005...'. There are a few grammatical errors, including missing articles ('at social centre') and minor preposition slips ('seen at number of participants' instead of 'seen in the number'). Nevertheless, these errors are relatively infrequent and do not impede communication, with many sentences remaining completely error-free.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.