Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The line graph tracks the number of participants at a social centre, participating in different activities in Melbourne, Australia during the years 2000 to 2020. These activities include film club, martial arts, amateur dramatics, table tennis and musical performances.

Overall, people showed more interest in film as it maintained a record for the highest number of participants throughout the given period. In contrast, musical permormances had a minimum number of attendees.

Although enrollments in table tennis were lower (recorded at figures of 16) in the year 2000, it rose rapidly after the year 2010 and reported at values of 36 in the year 2015 and 51 in the year 2020. Amateur dramatics were at 25 in the year 2000 and at 26 in the year 2005, however, the figures dropped in the following years and recorded at only 5 participants in 2020. While the martial arts kept the number of participants between 30 to 40 during the given years 2000 to 2020.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The student successfully covers all parts of the task by reporting the main features, trends, and making relevant comparisons across the five activities. The introduction correctly paraphrases the prompt, and an overview is provided noting that the film club maintained the highest participation while musical performances had the lowest. Key data points are selected and reported accurately, such as the rise in table tennis from 16 to 51/54 and the decline in amateur dramatics down to 5 or 6 by 2020. The response is fully developed and well-grounded in the visual data, satisfying all requirements of the task effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The text demonstrates a clear logical organization and progression throughout. Information is grouped sensibly into an introduction, an overview paragraph, and a body paragraph detailing specific trends. Cohesive devices are used reasonably well, such as 'Overall', 'In contrast', 'Although', and 'however'. Paragraphing is used appropriately to structure the response. While referencing and linking are generally clear, occasional minor awkwardness in transitions prevents a higher band, but the overall progression of ideas remains easy to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate and generally appropriate range of vocabulary for the task, incorporating terms such as 'participants', 'enrollments', 'maintain', and 'fluctuate'. There are some successful less common items and phrasing, such as 'maintained a record for the highest number'. However, there is a spelling typo ('permormances' instead of 'performances') and some slight lexical awkwardness, such as 'reported at values of' rather than 'stood at' or 'reached'. Nevertheless, the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the message clearly and precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The response features a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including subordinate clauses ('Although enrollments in table tennis were lower...'). Control of grammar is generally good, and many sentences are error-free. However, there are a few minor grammatical slips and awkward passive constructions, such as 'recorded at only 5 participants' instead of 'was recorded at'. Punctuation is mostly accurate, and communication is never impeded by the occasional grammatical inaccuracies.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.