Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-29
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The line chart provides information regarding the numbers of participants to engage a wide range of activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia between 2000 and 2020.
Overall, it is evident that the numbers of participants for film club, table tennis, and musical performances increased over the 20-year period, while amateur dramatics experienced a declined. Notably, the participants for table tannis witnessed the most significantly change throughout the period.
To begin with, the higher amount of participants for film club, at around 65 in 2000, which increased steadily to roungly 68 after 2020. In contrast, musical performances was not common from 2000 to 2005. In 2010, at more than 10 of participants in 2010, it then gradually increased to about 15 in 2020.
In 2000, at around 25 participants for amateur dramaties. Following this, it showed a sharp fell, ending up with 5 pariticipants in 2020.
In case of martial arts, this pattern showd a fluctuation from 2000 to 2020. The figure for table tennis stood at approximately 15 participants in 2000, which slightly increased to around 20 participants in 2010. After that, it followed an upword trend, reaching to about 55 participants in the last year.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The student successfully covers all parts of the task by reporting the main features and making relevant comparisons across the five activities shown in the chart. An appropriate overall trend is identified in the introduction and overview paragraph, noting the general increases, decreases, and fluctuations. Key data points are selected and reported accurately, such as the film club starting at around 64 and table tennis rising significantly to 54 in 2020. However, there are some minor inaccuracies in specific figures reported in the body paragraphs (e.g., stating table tennis reached about 55 or film club reached roughly 68). Despite these minor data reading slips, the overall response provides a clear summary of the visual data. This performance satisfies the criteria for Band 6.5, leaning towards Band 7.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall arrangement with a distinct introduction, overview, and body paragraphs dedicated to grouping the different activities logically. Cohesive devices are employed to link ideas, such as "Overall, it is evident", "To begin with", and "In contrast". However, referencing and paragraph cohesion are occasionally faulty or mechanical, as seen in fragmented sentence structures like "the higher amount of participants for film club, at around 65 in 2000, which increased steadily..." where the verb structure breaks down. Paragraphing is used, but the internal flow within paragraphs can be slightly disjointed due to awkward transitional phrasing. Overall organisation is coherent, supporting a Band 6 score.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as "fluctuation", "steadily", and "significantly". However, there are several noticeable word choice, spelling, and collocation errors throughout the text, including "tannis" instead of "tennis", "declined" instead of "decline", "amount of participants" instead of "number of participants", and "upword" instead of "upward". Additionally, phrases like "participants to engage a wide range of activities" are unnatural. These lexical slips and spelling errors occasionally reveal limitations, placing the response firmly at Band 6.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating relative clauses and comparative structures. However, grammatical control is inconsistent, resulting in several major structural errors and non-sentences. For instance, "In 2010, at more than 10 of participants in 2010, it then gradually increased..." lacks a main verb clause, and "In contrast, musical performances was not common..." demonstrates a subject-verb agreement error with plural/singular nouns. Other errors include "this pattern showd a fluctuation". While communication is not severely impeded and the meaning remains understandable, the frequency of grammatical and punctuation errors prevents the response from achieving a higher band. A score of 6.0 is appropriate.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
