Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line graph illustrates the number of participlants in five different activities at a social center in Melbourne Austraila,between 2000 and 2020. Overall, the film club remained the most popular activity thoughout the period, while table tennis experienced the most significant increase.In contrast, amateur drametics saw a considerable decline, Musical performance also became more popular over time. In 2000 around 64 people participated in the film club,This fidure fell slightly to 60 in 2010 beofre rising to 66 in 2020. Martial arts started at approximately 36 participants and fluctuated throughout the period,ending at the same level in 2020. table tennis had about 16 participants in 2000. The number increased to 20 in 2005 and remained unchanged in 2010.After that,it rose sharply to 36 in 2015 and reached 54 in 2020.By contrast, amateur dramatics increased slightly from 26 in 2000 to 28 in 2005, but then declined steadily to only 7 participants by 2020. Finally,musical performances had no participants in 2000 and 2005, However,the figure rose to 12 in 2010 and continued increasing,reaching appproimately 18 in 2020.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response gives a clear overview of the main patterns: the film club remained the most popular, table tennis rose markedly, and amateur dramatics declined. It also reports the musical performances’ emergence and the broadly stable, fluctuating pattern for martial arts. Most figures are accurately selected, including the film club’s fall to 60 before recovery and table tennis’s rise to 54. The final amateur dramatics figure is given as 7 rather than approximately 6, a small discrepancy that does not alter the trend. To strengthen the report further, make comparisons between activities more explicit—for example, noting that table tennis overtook martial arts by 2015 and became the second-largest activity by 2020. Overall, the key features are covered and supported with relevant data.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The information is generally presented in a sensible order: an introduction and overview are followed by details about the activities, with contrast markers such as “In contrast,” “By contrast,” and “Finally.” This helps the reader follow the main trends. However, the response is written as one continuous paragraph, so the overview and supporting details are not visually separated. Some transitions are also awkward or inconsistently punctuated, such as “After that,it rose sharply” and “However,the figure rose.” Grouping the overview into its own paragraph and organising the detailed comparisons into one or two further paragraphs would make the progression clearer. Use linking expressions selectively and ensure punctuation and spacing support the connections between sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The response uses an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “fluctuated,” “declined steadily,” “rose sharply,” and “remained unchanged.” These choices communicate the main trends clearly, and “most popular” is an effective summary of the film club’s position. There are, however, several spelling errors, including “participlants,” “Austraila,” “drametics,” and “appproimately,” which reduce accuracy. Some phrasing is also repetitive, particularly the repeated use of “the figure” and “the number.” Aim for more precise alternatives such as “participation,” “attendance,” or “the total,” while checking spelling carefully. Greater variety in describing changes and comparisons would make the vocabulary more flexible and polished.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response attempts a mix of sentence forms, including a complex overview sentence with “while” and contrast clauses using “though” and “but.” Most trends remain understandable, and the past tense is generally appropriate for the period shown. However, punctuation and sentence boundaries are not consistently controlled: for example, “In 2000 around 64 people participated in the film club,This figure…” joins two sentences with a comma, while “However” is incorrectly attached after a comma in “2005, However,the figure…”. Missing spaces after punctuation also interrupt the flow. There are some errors in capitalisation, such as beginning “table tennis” with a lowercase letter after a full stop. Use full stops or semicolons to separate complete clauses, and proofread sentence boundaries and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.