Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-15
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The given line graph depicts about the number of participants performed in various activities in a social centre in melbourne, australia from 2000 until 2020.
In the general overview, most of participants taken part in film club and table tennis , while least number participants could be involved in music performance.
It is evident from the chart that in 2000, 18 participants compete in table tennis and this number significantly increased to 48 in 2015 and 52 in 2020. Performers in martial arts were 38 in 2000 , while follow fluctuation trend in upcoming year , remained same in 2020. Moreover, there was no one perform in musical performance until 2015. Surprisingly, number of participants in musical field was inclined to 10 in 2010, further the participants was rose to 18 in 2020.
Probing ahead, around 65 performers were acted in film club in 2000 and the number gradually rose to 70 in 2020. In amateur dramatics,the number of participants were increased to 30 in 2005 as compared to 2000. There was rapid drop noticed in the number of performs in amateur dramatics upto 2020.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You identify several relevant patterns, including the film club’s consistently high participation, the rise in table tennis, and the decline in amateur dramatics. However, some figures and comparisons are inaccurate: table tennis is about 16 in 2000, 36 in 2015 and 54 in 2020, rather than 18, 48 and 52; film club rises only from about 64 to 66, not to 70. The overview also calls musical performances the least popular, although they finish above amateur dramatics, and says there were no musical performances until 2015, despite their appearance in 2010. The main trends are present, but the overview and reporting need more accurate selection and comparison of the data.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and two paragraphs describing groups of activities. This gives the reader a basic route through the information. However, progression within the body paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and the grouping does not consistently support comparisons across the years. Connectors such as “Moreover,” “Surprisingly,” and “Probing ahead” are used, but some feel mechanical or do not clearly show the relationship between the facts. The overview’s claim about the least popular activity also conflicts with the later figures. To improve, organise the details around contrasting trends—for example, the rising table-tennis figures against the fall in amateur dramatics—and use clear references to years and series.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “fluctuation,” “increased,” “gradually,” and “rapid drop,” which helps describe changes over time. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, making parts of the report awkward: “participants performed in various activities,” “participants compete in table tennis,” and “the number of performs” do not express the intended meaning naturally. There is also repetition of “participants” and “number,” while “musical performance” and “musical field” are used inconsistently for the chart category. Aim for precise trend language and standard activity labels, such as “participated in,” “rose,” “fell,” and “musical performances.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response attempts both simple and longer sentences, and the overall meaning can usually be followed. However, errors are frequent, particularly in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “participants performed” and “participants compete” use unsuitable verb forms, while “the participants was rose” combines incompatible structures. Agreement is also faulty in “the number of participants were increased,” and several sentences omit necessary articles or have awkward punctuation and spacing. These problems sometimes make the trend descriptions difficult to interpret. Practise forming accurate past-tense comparisons, such as “the figure rose from X to Y,” and check subject–verb agreement and sentence boundaries before submitting.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.